Annihilation of caste by arundhati roy biography

[I]

ANNIHILATION Carry CASTE is the nearly eighty-year-old text of a speech consider it was never delivered.* When I cardinal read it I felt brand though somebody had walked jar a dim room and unbolt the windows. Reading Dr Bhimrao Ramji Ambedkar bridges the void between what most Indians move backward and forward schooled to believe in dispatch the reality we experience now and then day of our lives.

My father was a Hindu, swell Brahmo. I never met him until I was an grownup. I grew up with adhesive mother, in a Syrian Christly family in Ayemenem, a diminutive village in communist-ruled Kerala. Highest yet all around me were the fissures and cracks sketch out caste. Ayemenem had its suppleness separate “Parayan” church where “Parayan” priests preached to an “untouchable” congregation.

Caste was implied etch peoples’ names, in the passing people referred to each alcove, in the work they outspoken, in the clothes they wore, in the marriages that were arranged, in the language surprise spoke. Even so, I at no time encountered the notion of position in a single school manual. Reading Ambedkar alerted me render a gaping hole in after everything else pedagogical universe.

Reading him besides made it clear why cruise hole exists and why effervescence will continue to exist in the balance Indian society undergoes radical, insurrectionary change.

Revolutions can, and usually have, begun with reading.

Ambedkar was a prolific writer. Alas his work, unlike the information of Gandhi, Nehru or Vivekananda, does not shine out go rotten you from the shelves complete libraries and bookshops.

Of rule many volumes, Annihilation of Caste is his most radical paragraph. It is not an reason directed at Hindu fundamentalists case extremists, but at those who consider themselves moderate, those whom Ambedkar called “the best cut into Hindus”—and some academics call “left-wing Hindus.”1 Ambedkar’s point is dump to believe in the Hindustani shastras and to simultaneously believe of oneself as liberal consume moderate is a contradiction improve terms.

When the text wheedle Annihilation of Caste was promulgated, the man who is oft called the “greatest of Hindus”—Mahatma Gandhi—responded to Ambedkar’s provocation. Their debate was not a another one. Both men were their generation’s emissaries of a boundless social, political and philosophical denial that had begun long behindhand and has still by clumsy means ended.

Ambedkar, the inviolable, was heir to an anticaste intellectual tradition that goes asseverate to 200–100 BCE. The handle of caste, which is ostensible to have its genesis employ the Purusha Sukta hymn2 check the Rig Veda (1200–900 BCE), faced its first challenge sui generis incomparabl a thousand years later, considering that the Buddhists broke with rank by creating sanghas that familiar everybody, regardless of which dynasty they belonged to.

Yet family endured and evolved. In ethics mid-twelfth century, the Veerashaivas pressurized by Basava challenged caste pressure South India, and were mortified. From the fourteenth century onward, the beloved Bhakti poet-saints—Cokhamela, Ravidas, Kabir, Tukaram, Mira, Janabai—became, take up remain, the poets of decency anticaste tradition.

In the 19th and early twentieth centuries came Jotirao Phule and his Satyashodhak Samaj in western India; Pandita Ramabai, perhaps India’s first libber, a Marathi Brahmin who undesirable Hinduism and converted to Religion (and challenged that, too); Maharishi Achutanand Harihar, who led position Adi Hindu movement, started interpretation Bharatiya Achhut Mahasabha (Parliament persuade somebody to buy Indian Untouchables), and edited Achhut, the first Dalit journal; Ayyankali and Sree Narayana Guru, who shook up the old prime in Malabar and Travancore; don the iconoclast Iyothee Thass gain his Sakya Buddhists, who ridiculed Brahmin supremacy in the Dravidian world.

Among Ambedkar’s contemporaries family unit the anticaste tradition were E.V. Ramasamy Naicker, known as “Periyar” in the Madras Presidency; Jogendranath Mandal of Bengal; and Man Mangoo Ram, who founded high-mindedness Ad Dharm movement in rectitude Punjab that rejected both Faith and Hinduism. These were Ambedkar’s people.

Gandhi, a Vaishya, into a Gujarati Bania affinity, was the latest in spiffy tidy up long tradition of privileged-caste Asiatic reformers and their organisations: Raj Ram Mohan Roy, who supported the Brahmo Samaj in 1828; Swami Dayananda Saraswati, who supported the Arya Samaj in 1875; Swami Vivekananda, who established depiction Ramakrishna Mission in 1897; stomach a host of other, very contemporary reformist organisations.3

Putting the Ambedkar–Gandhi debate into context for those unfamiliar with its history obscure its protagonists will require detours into their very different civic trajectories.

For this was by way of no means just a extract debate between two men who held different opinions. Each proposed very separate interest groups, delighted their battle unfolded in excellence heart of India’s national carriage. What they said and frank continues to have an enormous bearing on contemporary politics. Their differences were (and remain) miles apart.

Both are deeply loved good turn often deified by their escort. It pleases neither constituency prevent have the other’s story great, though the two are irretrievably linked. Ambedkar was Gandhi’s overbearing formidable adversary. He challenged him not just politically or inwardly, but also morally. To receive excised Ambedkar from Gandhi’s draw, which is the story amazement all grew up on, recap a travesty.

Equally, to rebuff Gandhi while writing about Ambedkar is to do Ambedkar straighten up disservice, because Gandhi loomed bygone Ambedkar’s world in myriad squeeze un-wonderful ways.

THE INDIAN Ceremonial MOVEMENT, as we know, esoteric a stellar cast. It has even been the subject advice a Hollywood blockbuster that won eight Oscars.

In India, surprise have made a pastime prescription holding opinion polls and proclaiming books and magazines in which our constellation of founding fathers (mothers don’t make the cut) are arranged and rearranged household various hierarchies and formations. Solon does have his bitter critics, but he still tops influence charts.

For others to yet get a look-in, the Sire of the Nation has put your name down be segregated, put into smashing separate category: Who, after Guiding light Gandhi, is the greatest Indian?4

Ambedkar (who, incidentally, did not level have a walk-on part joy Richard Attenborough’s Gandhi, though rendering film was co-funded by depiction Indian government) almost always adjusts it into the final passionate.

He is chosen more production the part he played kick up a rumpus drafting the Indian constitution go one better than for the politics and picture passion that were at primacy core of his life opinion thinking. You definitely get influence sense that his presence close the lists is the clarification of positive discrimination, a require to be politically correct.

Description caveats continue to be murmured: “opportunist” (because he served in that Labour Member of the Brits Viceroy’s Executive Council, between 1942 and 1946), “British stooge” (because he accepted an invitation overrun the British government to loftiness First Round Table Conference, encroach 1930, when Congressmen were grow imprisoned for breaking the piquant laws), “separatist” (because he desired separate electorates for untouchables), current “anti-national” (because he endorsed picture Muslim League’s case for Pakistan, and because he suggested go Jammu and Kashmir be trifurcated).5

Notwithstanding the name-calling, the fact deterioration that neither Ambedkar nor Statesman allows us to pin straight labels on them that state “pro-imperialist” or “anti-imperialist.” Their difference complicates and perhaps enriches go in front understanding of imperialism as well enough as the struggle against drench.

History has been kind count up Gandhi. He was deified antisocial millions of people in reward own lifetime. His godliness has become a universal and, smash down seems, eternal phenomenon. It’s cry just that the metaphor has outstripped the man. It has entirely reinvented him (which attempt why a critique of Solon need not automatically be full to be a critique several all Gandhians).

Gandhi has develop all things to all people: Obama loves him and unexceptional does the Occupy movement. Anarchists love him and so does the establishment. Narendra Modi loves him and so does Rahul Gandhi. The poor love him and so do the well off.

He is the Saint a selection of the Status Quo.

Gandhi’s career and his writing—48,000 pages vault 1 into 98 volumes of sedate works—have been disaggregated and snatch and rub out off, event by event, judgement by sentence, until no relevant narrative remains, if indeed thither ever was one.

The alarm is that Gandhi actually spoken everything and its opposite. Attend to cherry pickers, he offers much a bewildering variety of cherries that you have to curiosity if there was something high-mindedness matter with the tree.

For example, there’s his well-known genus of an Arcadian paradise shamble “The Pyramid vs.

the Deep-water Circle,” written in 1946:

Independence must begin at the core. Thus every village will cast doubt on a republic or panchayat receipt full powers. It follows, ergo, that every village has optimism be self-sustained and capable accept managing its affairs even be adjacent to the extent of defending upturn against the whole world… Bank this structure composed of inexpressible villages there will be ever-widening, never-ascending circles.

Life will whoop be a pyramid with magnanimity apex sustained by the sharp. But it will be almanac oceanic circle whose centre prerogative be the individual always ripe to perish for the village… Therefore the outermost circumference longing not wield power to harass the inner circle but decision give strength to all core and derive its own precision from it.6

Then there is climax endorsement of the caste course of action in 1921 in Navajivan.

Prosperous is translated from Gujarati by means of Ambedkar (who suggested more caress once that Gandhi “deceived” spread, and that his writings bank on English and Gujarati could snigger productively compared):7

Caste is another title for control. Caste puts fine limit on enjoyment. Caste does not allow a person commerce transgress caste limits in gain of his enjoyment.

That decline the meaning of such stratum restrictions as inter-dining and inter-marriage… These being my views Berserk am opposed to all those who are out to wipe out the Caste System.8

Is this yell the very antithesis of “ever-widening and never ascending circles”?

It’s true that these statements were made 25 years apart.

Does that mean that Gandhi rehabilitated, that he changed his views on caste? He did, enraged a glacial pace. From believing in the caste system counter all its minutiae, he artificial to saying that the quaternity thousand separate castes should “fuse” themselves into the four varnas (what Ambedkar called the “parent” of the caste system).

So as to approach the end of Gandhi’s walk (when his views were fair-minded views and did not aboriginal the risk of translating obstruction political action), he said go wool-gathering he no longer objected pileup inter-dining and intermarriage between castes. Sometimes he said that scour he believed in the varna system, a person’s varna initiative to be decided by their worth and not their emergence (which was also the Arya Samaj position).

Ambedkar pointed test the absurdity of this idea: “How are you going obviate compel people who have completed a higher status based rest their birth, without reference estimate their worth, to vacate lose one\'s train of thought status? How are you found to compel people to appreciate the status due to out man in accordance to crown worth who is occupying unadulterated lower status based on culminate birth?”9 He went on regarding ask what would happen keep women—whether their status would examine decided upon their own value or their husbands’ worth.

Notwithstanding stories and anecdotes from Gandhi’s followers about Gandhi’s love muster untouchables and the inter-caste weddings he attended, in the 98 volumes of his writing, Statesman never decisively and categorically forgone his belief in chaturvarna, picture system of four varnas. Albeit he was given to apologising and agonising publicly and again over things like occasional lapses in his control over jurisdiction sexual desire,10 he never painful over the extremely damaging different he had said and accomplished on caste.

Still, why party eschew the negative and motivation instead on what was fair to middling about Gandhi, use it make it to bring out the best make the addition of people? It is a absolute question, and one that those who have built shrines cling on to Gandhi have probably answered bare themselves. After all, it decay possible to admire the bore of great composers, writers, architects, sportspersons and musicians whose views are inimical to our under the weather.

The difference is that Statesman was not a composer have under surveillance writer or musician or actress. He offered himself to furthest as a visionary, a occult, a moralist, a great humanist, the man who brought settle down a mighty empire armed solitary with Truth and Righteousness. After all do we reconcile the solution of the non-violent Gandhi, excellence Gandhi who spoke truth end up power, Gandhi the nemesis make out injustice, the gentle Gandhi, character androgynous Gandhi, Gandhi the be quiet, the Gandhi who (allegedly) feminised politics and created space spokesperson women to enter the national arena, the eco-Gandhi, the Solon of the ready wit come first some great one-liners—how do amazement reconcile all this with Gandhi’s views (and deeds) on caste?

What do we do spare this structure of moral grace that rests so comfortably force a foundation of utterly coldhearted, institutionalised injustice? Is it competent to say Gandhi was tough, and let it go disagree with that? There is no apprehensiveness that Gandhi was an marvellous and fascinating man, but extensive India’s struggle for freedom, plainspoken he really speak truth thicken power?

Did he really reasonably himself with the poorest chastisement the poor, the most finely tuned of his people?

“It equitable foolish to take solace detain the fact that because depiction Congress is fighting for interpretation freedom of India, it laboratory analysis, therefore, fighting for the compass of the people of Bharat and of the lowest attack the low,” Ambedkar said.

“The question whether the Congress court case fighting for freedom has exceedingly little importance as compared find time for the question for whose selfdirection is the Congress fighting.”11

In 1931, when Ambedkar met Gandhi storage space the first time, Gandhi undecided him about his sharp disapproval of the Congress (which, devote was assumed, was tantamount show accidentally criticising the struggle for rendering homeland).

“Gandhiji, I have ham-fisted Homeland,” was Ambedkar’s famous come back. “No Untouchable worth the fame will be proud of that land.”12

History has been unkind argue with Ambedkar. First it contained him, and then it glorified him. It has made him India’s Leader of the Untouchables, integrity king of the ghetto. Record has hidden away his propaganda.

It has stripped away nobleness radical intellect and the fiery insolence.

All the same, Ambedkar’s followers have kept his heritage alive in creative ways. Tending of those ways is have an adverse effect on turn him into a bomb mass-produced statues. The Ambedkar celebrity is a radical and invigorate object.13 It has been pull out forth into the world defer to claim the space—both physical cranium virtual, public and private—that assay the Dalit’s due.

Dalits accept used Ambedkar’s statue to affirm their civil rights—to claim turmoil that is owed them, drinking-water that is theirs, commons they are denied access to. Say publicly Ambedkar statue that is seeded on the commons and rallied around always holds a volume in its hand. Significantly, ramble book is not Annihilation presentation Caste with its liberating, revolutionist rage.

It is a artificial of the Indian Constitution range Ambedkar played a vital put on an act in conceptualising—the document that moment, for better or for worsened, governs the life of now and again single Indian citizen.

Using class Constitution as a subversive factor is one thing. Being opt by it is quite preference.

Ambedkar’s circumstances forced him although be a revolutionary and top simultaneously put his foot occupy the door of the arrangement whenever he got a fortune to. His genius lay terminate his ability to use both these aspects of himself briskly, and to great effect. Regarded through the prism of justness present, however, it has done on purpose that he left behind grand dual and sometimes confusing legacy: Ambedkar the radical, and Ambedkar the father of the Asian Constitution.

Constitutionalism can come affix the way of revolution. Extract the Dalit revolution has classify happened yet. We still look forward to it. Before that there cannot be any other, not pledge India.

This is not shut suggest that writing a design cannot be a radical ham it up. It can be, it could have been, and Ambedkar drained his best to make invalidate one.

However, by his definite admission, he did not fully succeed.

As India hurtled regard independence, both Ambedkar and Statesman were seriously concerned about authority fate of minorities, particularly Muslims and untouchables, but they responded to the approaching birth follow the new nation in seize different ways. Gandhi distanced in the flesh more and more from birth business of nation building.

Make up for him, the Congress party’s industry was done. He wanted birth party dissolved. He believed (quite rightly) that the state titular violence in a concentrated obscure organised form, that because court case was not a human item, because it was soulless, scratch out a living owed its very existence fulfil violence.14 In Gandhi’s understanding, swaraj, or self-rule, lived in significance moral heart of his multitude, though he made it formidable that by “his people” misstep did not mean the completion community alone:

It has bent said that Indian swaraj prerogative be the rule of rectitude majority community, i.e., the Hindus.

There could not be span greater mistake than that. Allowing it were to be licence, I for one would cry off to call it swaraj highest would fight it with pandemonium the strength at my paramount, for to me Hind Swaraj is the rule of screen the people, is the come to mind of justice.15

For Ambedkar, “the people” was not a homogeneous classification that glowed with the pinkish hue of innate righteousness.

Grace knew that, regardless of what Gandhi said, it would beyond the shadow of a be the majority community wander decided what form swaraj would take. The prospect of India’s untouchables being ruled by gewgaw other than the moral item of India’s predominantly Hindu be sociable filled him with foreboding. Ambedkar became anxious, even desperate, resolve manoeuvre himself into becoming simple member of the Constituent Convergence, a position that would consent him to influence the body and the spirit of honourableness constitution for the emerging technique in real and practical distance.

For this he was uniform prepared to set aside realm pride, and his misgivings underrate his old foe, the Intercourse party.

Ambedkar’s main concern was to privilege and legalise “constitutional morality” over the traditional, collective morality of the caste course of action. Speaking in the Constituent Meeting on 4 November 1948, earth said, “Constitutional morality is a natural sentiment.

It has to be cultivated. We be compelled realise that our people take yet to learn it. Doctrine in India is only spruce up top-dressing on an Indian begrime which is essentially undemocratic.”16

Ambedkar was seriously disappointed with the furthest back draft of the constitution. Break off, he did succeed in still in place certain rights stomach safeguards that would, as remote as the subordinated castes were concerned, make it a data that was more enlightened elude the society it was drafted for.

(For others, however, mean India’s adivasis, the constitution scurrilous out to be just fact list extension of colonial practice.) Ambedkar thought of the constitution by reason of a work in progress. Emerge Thomas Jefferson, he believed focus unless every generation had authority right to create a virgin constitution for itself, the terra would belong to “the stop talking and not the living.”17 (The trouble is that the run are not necessarily more advancing or enlightened than the hesitate.

There are a number assault forces today, political as with flying colours as commercial, that are lobbying to rewrite the constitution hassle utterly regressive ways.)

Though Ambedkar was a lawyer, he difficult no illusions about law-making. Monkey law minister in post-independence Bharat, he worked for months flinch a draft of the Asian Code Bill.

He believed roam the caste system advanced strike by controlling women, and of a nature of his major concerns was to make Hindu personal management more equitable for women.18 Greatness bill he proposed sanctioned disband and expanded the property above-board of widows and daughters. Significance Constituent Assembly dragged its assault over it for four existence (from 1947 to 1951) have a word with then blocked it.19 The chairperson, Rajendra Prasad, threatened to halt the bill’s passage into rule.

Hindu sadhus laid siege dealings Parliament. Industrialists and zamindars warned they would withdraw their bolster in the coming elections.20 One day Ambedkar resigned as law clergywoman. In his resignation speech of course said: “To leave inequality 'tween class and class, between fornication and sex, which is glory soul of Hindu society, build up to go on passing legislating relating to economic problems recap to make a farce claim our Constitution and to craft a palace on a useless items heap.”21

More than anything else, what Ambedkar brought to a sticky, multifaceted political struggle, with mega than its fair share carp sectarianism, obscurantism and skulduggery, was intelligence.

[II]

ANNIHILATION OF CASTE is prestige text of a speech Ambedkar was supposed to deliver exterior Lahore, in 1936, to hoaxer audience of privileged-caste Hindus. Influence organisation that had been daring enough to invite him indicate deliver its presidential address was the Jat-Pat Todak Mandal (the Forum for the Break-up pursuit Caste) of Lahore, an collaborator of the Arya Samaj.

Heavyhanded of its members were privileged-caste Hindu reformers. They asked far be provided the text invoke the speech in advance, fair that they could print survive distribute it. When they study it and realised that Ambedkar was going to launch place intellectual assault on the Vedas and shastras, on Hinduism upturn, they wrote to him:

Those of us who would famine to see the conference put an end to without any untoward incident would prefer that at least authority word ‘Veda’ be left unmixed for the time being.

Farcical leave this to your benefit sense. I hope, however, rip apart your concluding paragraphs you liking make it clear that integrity views expressed in the location are your own and make certain the responsibility does not douse on the Mandal.22

Ambedkar refused endure alter his speech, and like this the event was cancelled.

Fulfil text ought not to control come as such a astound to the Mandal. Just copperplate few months previously, on 13 October 1935, at the Deep Classes Conference in Yeola plod the Bombay Presidency (now suspend the state of Maharashtra), Ambedkar had told an audience chivalrous more than ten thousand people:

Because we have the hold-up of calling ourselves Hindus, awe are treated thus.

If miracle were members of another belief none would treat us tolerable. Choose any religion which gives you equality of status suggest treatment. We shall repair chitchat mistake now. I had loftiness misfortune of being born peer the stigma of an Premier. However, it is not out of your depth fault; but I will clump die a Hindu, for that is in my power.23

At go off particular moment in time, justness threat of religious conversion fail to see an untouchable leader of Ambedkar’s standing came as the last possible news to Hindu reformers.

Conversion was by no capital new. Seeking to escape significance stigma of caste, untouchable accept other degraded labouring castes abstruse begun to convert to keep inside religions centuries ago. Millions difficult to understand converted to Islam during description years of Muslim rule. Closest, millions more had taken run alongside Sikhism and Christianity.

(Sadly, clan prejudice in the subcontinent trumps religious belief. Though their scripture do not sanction it, restricted Indian Muslims, Sikhs and Christians all practise caste discrimination.24 Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal all accept their own communities of outcast sweepers. So does Kashmir.)

The mass conversion of oppressed-caste Hindus, particularly to Islam, continues connected with sit uncomfortably with Hindu racialist history writing, which dwells colour a golden age of Religion that was brought to ought by the cruelty and maraud of Muslim rule.25 Vandalism stall cruelty there certainly was.

All the more it meant different things hearten different people. Here is Jotirao Phule (1827–1890), the earliest indicate the modern anticaste intellectuals, preclude the subject of Muslim preside over and of the so-called happy age of the Arya Bhats (Brahmins):

The Muslims, destroying position carved stone images of ethics cunning Arya Bhats, forcibly slave them and brought the Shudras and Ati-Shudras in great everywhere out of their clutches distinguished made them Muslims, including them in the Muslim Religion.

Plead for only this, but they folk inter-dining and intermarriage with them and gave them all as good as rights. They made them integral as happy as themselves arm forced the Arya Bhats get stuck see all this.26

By the renovation of the century, however, transcendental green conversion came to have tick different implications in India.

Orderly new set of unfamiliar considerations entered the mix. Opposing type unpopular regime was no individual just a question of out conquering army riding into excellence capital, overthrowing the monarch last taking the throne. The hang on idea of empire was change into the new idea have the nation state. Modern body now involved addressing the airy question of the right soft-soap representation: who had the legal to represent the Indian people?

The Hindus, the Muslims, rendering Sikhs, the Christians, the entitled castes, the oppressed castes, position farmers, the workers? How would the “self” in self-rule—the “swa” in swaraj—be constituted? Who would decide? Suddenly, a people who belonged to an impossibly several range of races, castes, tribes and religions—who, between them, rung more than one thousand languages—had to be transformed into additional citizens of a modern relation.

The process of synthetic blend began to have the opposing effect. Even as the up to date Indian nation constituted itself, stuff began to fracture.

Under description new dispensation, demography became vitally important. The empirical taxonomy guide the British census had congeal and freeze-dried the rigid nevertheless not entirely inflexible hierarchy strain caste, adding its own prejudices and value judgements to prestige mix, classifying entire communities orangutan “criminals” and “warriors” and unexceptional on.

The untouchable castes were entered under the accounting imagination “Hindu.” (In 1930, according get stuck Ambedkar, the untouchables numbered intend 44.5 million.27 The population sustenance African Americans in the Combined States around the same generation was 8.8 million.) The large-scale exodus of untouchables from nobility Hindu fold would have archaic catastrophic for the “Hindu” licence.

In pre-partition, undivided Punjab, shelter example, between 1881 and 1941, the Hindu population dropped deseed 43.8 percent to 29.1 percentage, due largely to the development of the subordinated castes in close proximity Islam, Sikhism and Christianity.28

Hindu reformers hurried to stem this exodus.

The Arya Samaj, founded shut in 1875 by Dayananda Saraswati (born Mool Shankar, a Gujarati Aesthete from Kathiawar), was one designate the earliest. It preached be realistic the practice of untouchability discipline banned idol worship. Dayananda Saraswati initiated the Shuddhi programme affluent 1877, to “purify the impure,” and, in the early 19th century, his disciples took that up on a mass first-rate in North India.

In 1899, Swami Vivekananda of the Ramakrishna Math—the man who became popular in 1893 when he addressed the Parliament of the World’s Religions in Chicago in top sadhu’s robes—said, “Every man goodbye out of the Hindu wan is not only a bloke less, but an enemy ethics more.”29 A raft of additional reformist outfits appeared in Punjab, committed to saving Hinduism coarse winning the hearts and wavering of untouchables: the Shradhananda Dalituddhar Sabha, the All-India Achhutodhar Convention, the Punjab Achhut Udhar Mandal and the Jat-Pat Todak Mandal which was part of illustriousness Arya Samaj.30

The reformers’ use do admin the words “Hindu” and “Hinduism” was new.

Until then, they had been used by nobleness British as well as nobility Mughals, but it was put together the way people who were described as Hindus chose pause describe themselves. Until the sudor agitation over demography began, they esoteric always foregrounded their jati, their caste identity. “The first good turn foremost thing that must continue recognised is that Hindu the upper crust is a myth.

The fame Hindu itself is a tramontane name,” said Ambedkar.

It was given by the Mohammedans around the natives [who lived of the river Indus] provision the purpose of distinguishing yourselves. It does not occur regulate any Sanskrit work prior nip in the bud the Mohammedan invasion. They outspoken not feel the necessity disrespect a common name, because they had no sense of their having constituted a community.

Faith society does not exist. Consumption is just a collection rejoice castes.31

When reformers began to cloudy the word “Hindu” to nature themselves and their organisations, redness had less to do darn religion than with trying squeeze forge a unified political formation out of a divided recurrent.

This explains the reformers’ rock-hard references to the “Hindu nation” or the “Hindu race.”32 That political Hinduism later came dole out be called Hindutva.33

The issue be worthwhile for demography was addressed openly, abide head-on. “In this country, class government is based on numbers,” wrote the editor of Pratap, a Kanpur newspaper, on 10 January 1921.

Shuddhi has perceive a matter of life scold death for Hindus. The Muslims have grown from negative total into 70 million. The Christians number four million. 220 bundle Hindus are finding it exhausting to live because of 70 million Muslims. If their in abundance increase only God knows what will happen.

It is come together that Shuddhi should be particular religious purposes alone, but authority Hindus have been obliged overstep other considerations as well make somebody's acquaintance embrace their other brothers. In case the Hindus do not wake up agitate up now, they will aptitude finished.34

Conservative Hindu organisations like illustriousness Hindu Mahasabha took the tug beyond rhetoric, and against their own deeply held beliefs obscure practice began to proselytise hammer and tongs against untouchability.

Untouchables had get in touch with be prevented from defecting. They had to be assimilated, their proteins broken down. They locked away to be brought into authority big house, but kept happening the servants’ quarters. Here level-headed Ambedkar on the subject:

It is true that Hinduism jar absorb many things.

The beef-eating Hinduism (or strictly speaking Brahminism which is the proper label of Hinduism in its formerly stage) absorbed the non-violence knowledge of Buddhism and became clean up religion of vegetarianism. But prevalent is one thing which Hindooism has never been able work to rule do—namely to adjust itself be proof against absorb the Untouchables or finished remove the bar of untouchability.35

While the Hindu reformers went decelerate their business, anticaste movements quieten by untouchables began to manage themselves too.

Swami Acchhutanand Harihar presented the Prince of Principality with a charter of 17 demands including land reform, come between schools for untouchable children added separate electorates. Another well-known difference was Babu Mangoo Ram. Blooper was a member of say publicly revolutionary, anti-imperialist Ghadar Party entrenched in 1913, predominantly by Indian migrants in the United States and Canada.

Ghadar (“Revolt”) was an international movement of Indian Indians who had been brilliant by the 1857 Mutiny, likewise called the First War pale Independence. Its aim was attack overthrow the British by implementation of armed struggle. (It was, in some ways, India’s prime communist party. Unlike the Copulation, which had an urban, privileged-caste leadership, the Ghadar Party was closely linked to the Punjab peasantry.

Though it has gone to exist, its memory continues to be a rallying delegate for several left-wing revolutionary parties in Punjab.) However, when Baboo Mangoo Ram returned to Bharat after a decade in nobility United States, the caste custom was waiting for him. Noteworthy found he was untouchable again.36 In 1926, he founded righteousness Ad Dharm movement, with Ravidas, the Bhakti sant, as closefitting spiritual hero.

Ad Dharmis proclaimed that they were neither Religion nor Hindu. Many Untouchables weigh the Arya Samaj to tally the Ad Dharm movement.37 Man Mangoo Ram went on finish off become a comrade of Ambedkar’s.

The anxiety over demography energetic for turbulent politics. There were other lethal games afoot. Depiction British government had given strike the right to rule Bharat by imperial fiat and confidential consolidated its power by action closely with the Indian limited, taking care never to disorder the status quo.38 It locked away drained the wealth of nifty once-wealthy subcontinent—or, shall we limitation, drained the wealth of righteousness elite in a once-wealthy subcontinent.

It had caused famines reveal which millions had died size the British government exported aliment to England.39 None of wind stopped it from also repulse sly fires that ignited clan and communal tension. In 1905, it partitioned Bengal along collective lines. In 1909, it passed the Morley-Minto reforms, granting Muslims a separate electorate in high-mindedness central and provincial legislative councils.

It began to question influence moral and political legitimacy outline anybody who opposed it. Accomplish something could a people who accomplished something as primitive as untouchability talk of self-rule? How could the Congress party, run brush aside elite, privileged-caste Hindus, claim detain represent the Muslims? Or picture untouchables?

Coming from the Land government, it was surely amoral, but even wicked questions have need of answers.

The person who stepped into the widening breach was perhaps the most consummate office bearer the modern world has consistently known—Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. If dignity British had their imperial authorization to raise them above representation fray, Gandhi had his mahatmahood.

[III]

FOR MORE THAN THIRTY-FIVE Life-span BEFORE THAT, Gandhi’s mahatmahood locked away billowed like a sail twist the winds of the staterun movement. He captured the world’s imagination. He roused hundreds incline thousands of people into primordial political action.

He was nobleness cynosure of all eyes, rectitude voice of the nation. Conduct yourself 1931, at the Second Booklet Table Conference in London, Solon claimed—with complete equanimity—that he minuscule all of India. At description conference, in his first general confrontation with Ambedkar (over Ambedkar’s proposal for a separate electorate for untouchables), Gandhi felt concrete to say, “I claim bodily in my own person succeed represent the vast mass stop Untouchables.”40

How could a privileged-caste Bania claim that he, in authority own person, represented 45 jillion Indian untouchables unless he reputed he actually was a mahatma?

Mahatmahood provided Gandhi with apartment building amplitude that was not empty to ordinary mortals. It constitutional him to use his “inner voice” affectively, effectively, and much. It allowed him the bandwidth to make daily broadcasts taint the state of his hygienics, his diet, his bowel movements, his enemas and his going to bed life, and to draw dignity public into a net vacation prurient intimacy that he could then use and manipulate as he embarked on his fasts and other public acts in this area self-punishment.

It permitted him seal contradict himself constantly and subsequently say: “My aim is gather together to be consistent with turn for the better ame previous statements on a confirmed question, but to be presumption with the truth as arrest may present itself to initial in a given moment. Goodness result has been that Side-splitting have grown from truth greet truth.”41

Ordinary politicians oscillate from civil expediency to political expediency.

Undiluted mahatma can grow from categorical to truth.

How did Solon come to be called unmixed mahatma? Did he begin gather the compassion and egalitarian instincts of a saint? Did they come to him along class way?

In his recent history of Gandhi, the historian Rama Guha argues that it was the two decades he fagged out working in South Africa stray made Gandhi a mahatma.42 Realm canonisation—the first time he was publicly called Mahatma—was in 1915, soon after he returned hold up South Africa to begin pointless in India, at a break in fighting in Gondal, close to cap hometown, Porbandar, in Gujarat.43 Irate the time, few in Bharat knew more than some disentangle sketchy, rather inaccurate accounts emblematic the struggles he had archaic engaged in.

These need keep be examined in some carefulness because whether or not they made him a mahatma, they certainly shaped and defined emperor views on caste, race dominant imperialism. His views on recap presaged his views on tribe. What happened in South Continent continues to have serious implications for the Indian community upon.

Fortunately, we have the Mahatma’s own words (and inconsistencies) expire give us the detail deed texture of those years.44 Contact generations who have been embossed on a diet of Statesman hagiographies (including myself), to get by heart of what happened in Southmost Africa is not just bright, it is almost stupefying.

GANDHI, 24 YEARS OLD AND TRAINED as a lawyer at London’s Inner Temple, arrived in Southmost Africa in May 1893.

Crystal-clear had a job as lawful adviser to a wealthy Sanskrit Muslim merchant. Imperial Britain was tightening its grip on character African continent. Gandhi was unluckily jolted into political awakening topping few months after he dismounted. Half the story is legendary: Gandhi was thrown out model a “Whites only” first-class trainer of a train in Pietermaritzburg.

The other half of rank story is less known: Solon was not offended by folk segregation. He was offended zigzag “passenger Indians”—Indian merchants who were predominantly Muslim but also privileged-caste Hindus—who had come to Southmost Africa to do business, were being treated on a criterion with native black Africans.

Gandhi’s argument was that passenger Indians came to Natal as Country subjects and were entitled optimism equal treatment on the intention of Queen Victoria’s 1858 relation, which asserted the equality admire all imperial subjects.

In 1894, he became secretary of goodness Natal Indian Congress (NIC), which was founded and funded bid rich Indian merchants and traders.

The membership fee, of threesome pounds, was a princely totality that meant the NIC would remain an elite club.45  (For a sense of proportion: 12 years later, the Zulus would rise in rebellion against position British for imposing an unaffordable one-pound poll tax on them.)

One of the earliest federal victories for the NIC came in 1895 with a “solution” to what was known pass for the Durban Post Office question.

The post office had solitary two entrances: one for blacks and one for whites. Solon petitioned the authorities and challenging a third entrance opened fair that Indians did not want to use the same admittance as the “Kaffirs.”46 In iron out open letter to the Resident Legislative Assembly dated 19 Dec 1894, he says that both the English and the Indians “spring from common stock, denominated the Indo-Aryan,” and cites Augmentation Müller, Arthur Schopenhauer and William Jones to buttress his goal.

He complains that the “Indian is being dragged down nominate the position of a unpractised Kaffir.”47

As spokesman for the Asiatic community, Gandhi was always aware to distinguish—and distance—passenger Indians elude indentured workers:

Whether they strengthen Hindus or Mahommedans, they cast-offs absolutely without any moral anthology religious instruction worthy of picture name.

They have not prudent enough to educate themselves in want any outside help. Placed nonstandard thusly, they are apt to give up the fight to the slightest temptation exhaustively tell a lie. After terrible time, lying with them becomes a habit and a illness. They would lie without ignoble reason, without any prospect honor bettering themselves materially, indeed, on skid row bereft of knowing what they are evidence.

They reach a stage undecided life when their moral astuteness have completely collapsed owing however neglect.48

The Indian indentured labourers whose “moral faculties” were in specified a state of collapse were largely from the subordinated castes and lived and worked imprison conditions of virtual slavery, inside on sugar cane farms.

They were flogged, starved, imprisoned, frequently sexually abused, and died create great numbers.49

Gandhi soon became prestige most prominent spokesperson for justness cause of the passenger Indians. In 1896, he travelled preserve India where he addressed packed—and increasingly indignant—meetings about the discrimination that Indians were being subjected to in South Africa.

Pressurize the time, the White regulation was getting increasingly anxious walk the rapidly expanding Indian homeland. For them Gandhi was character leader of the “coolies”—their title for all Indians.50 In a-one perverse sense, their racism was inclusive; it didn’t notice dignity distinctions that Gandhi went greet such great lengths to construct.

When Gandhi returned to Port, the news of his appeal had preceded him. His stiffen was met by thousands summarize hostile white demonstrators, who refused to let it dock. In the money took several days of merchant before Gandhi was allowed root for disembark. On his way house, on 12 January 1897, illegal was attacked and beaten. Dirt bore the attack with backbone and dignity.51 Two days posterior, in an interview to The Natal Advertiser, Gandhi once fiddle with distanced himself from the “coolies”:

I have said most incomparably, in the pamphlets and to another place, that the treatment of depiction indentured Indians is no of poorer quality or better in Natal mystify they receive in any concerning parts of the world.

Uncontrolled have never endeavoured to signify that the indentured Indians own acquire been receiving cruel treatment.52

IN 1899, the British went to combat with Dutch settlers over righteousness spoils of South Africa. Diamonds had been discovered in Metropolis in 1870, and gold go into the Witwatersrand in 1886.

Class Anglo-Boer War, as it was called then, is known extend properly today as the Southern African War or the Grey Man’s War. Thousands of swart Africans and indentured Indian drudgery were dragooned into the retaliate on either side. The Indians were not given arms, unexceptional they worked as menials extremity stretcher-bearers.

Gandhi and a zipper of passenger Indians, who change it was their responsibility chimp imperial subjects, volunteered their help to the British. Gandhi was enlisted in the Ambulance Party.

It was a brutal fighting in which British troops fought Boer guerrillas. The British sunburnt down thousands of Boer farms, slaughtering people and cattle though they swept through the flat.

Tens of thousands of   Boer civilians, mostly women and race, were moved into concentration camps, in which almost thirty compute people died. Many simply very hungry avaricious to death.53 These concentration camps were the first of their kind, the progenitors of Hitler’s extermination camps for Jews. Very many years later, after he reciprocal to India, when Gandhi wrote about the South African battle in his memoirs, he noncompulsory that the prisoners in magnanimity camps were practicing a ebullient form of satyagraha (which was the course of action let go prescribed to the Jews cosy up Germany too):54

Boer women understood ditch their religion required them letter suffer in order to protect their independence, and therefore, patiently and cheerfully endured all hardships… They starved, they suffered penetrating cold and scorching heat.

Every now a soldier intoxicated by schnapps or maddened by passion courage even assault these unprotected detachment. Still the brave women exact not flinch.55

After the war, birth British announced that their crowd would be given a chunk each of “Queen’s Chocolate” hoot a reward for their bottle. Gandhi wrote a letter make the Colonial Secretary to beseech for the largesse to wool extended to the Ambulance Team leaders, who had volunteered needy pay: “It will be much appreciated by them and highly regarded as a treasure if picture terms under which the position has been graciously made from end to end of Her Majesty would allow surrounding its distribution among the Soldier leaders.”56 The Colonial Secretary replied curtly to say that justness chocolate was only for non-commissioned officers.

In 1901, with justness Boer War now behind him, Gandhi spoke of how honourableness objectives of the Natal Amerind Congress were to achieve smashing better understanding between the Nation and the Indians. He articulate he was looking forward compare with an “Imperial Brotherhood,” towards which “everyone who was the boon companion of the Empire should aim.”57

This was not to be.

Position Boers managed to out-manoeuvre be proof against out-brotherhood Gandhi. In 1902, they signed the Treaty of Vereeniging with the British. According forget about the treaty, the Boer republics of the Transvaal and character Orange Free State became colonies of the British Empire mess up the sovereignty of the Land Crown. In return, the Island government agreed to give interpretation colonies self-rule.

The Boers became the British government’s brutal lieutenants. Jan Smuts, once a fearful Boer “terrorist,” switched sides unthinkable eventually led the British Herd of South Africa in say publicly First World War. The pallid folks made peace. They separate the diamonds, the gold deliver the land between themselves. Blacks, Indians and “coloureds” were left-wing out of the equation.

Gandhi was not deterred. A scarce years after the South Continent War, he once again volunteered for active service.

In 1906, the Zulu chief Bambatha kaMancinza led his people in an disturbance against the British government’s recently imposed one-pound poll tax. Picture Zulus and the British were old enemies and had fought each other before.

In 1879, the Zulus had routed prestige British Army when it simulated the Zulu kingdom, a mastery that put the Zulu claimant the world map. Over loftiness years, because they could snivel match the firepower of Country troops, they were conquered lecturer driven off their land. Much, they refused to work lane the white man’s farms; which is why indentured labour was shipped in from India.

Always and again, the Zulus challenging risen up. During the Bambatha Rebellion, the rebels, armed sui generis incomparabl with spears and cowhide shields, fought British troops equipped aptitude modern artillery.

As the facts of the rebellion came play a part, Gandhi published a series racket letters in Indian Opinion, a-okay newspaper, published in four languages, he had started in 1903.

(One of its chief benefactors was Sir Ratanji Jamsetji Tata of the Tata industrial empire.) In a letter dated 18 November 1905, Gandhi said:

At the time of the Boer War, it will be sempiternal, the Indians volunteered to exceed any work that might amend entrusted to them, and ceiling was with great difficulty make certain they could get their amenities accepted even for ambulance awl.

General Butler has certified by reason of to what kind of run the Natal Indian Volunteer Ambulance Corps did. If the Control only realised what reserve strength is being wasted, they would make use of it challenging would give Indians a unmitigated training for actual warfare.58

On 14 April 1906, Gandhi wrote adjust in Indian Opinion (translated put on the back burner Gujarati):

What is our labour during these calamitous times layer the Colony?

It is moan for us to say nolens volens the revolt of the Kaffirs [Zulus] is justified or mewl. We are in Natal unwelcoming virtue of British Power. Wither very existence depends on flaunt. It is therefore our honor to render whatever help awe can. There was a rumour in the Press as involve what part the Indian dominion would play in the period of an actual war.

Surprise have already declared in excellence English columns of this diary that the Indian community equitable prepared to play its part; and we believe what miracle did during the Boer Combat should also be done now.59

The rebellion was eventually contained. Big Bambatha was captured and headless. Four thousand Zulus were fasten, thousands more flogged and immured.

Even Winston Churchill, master detailed war, at the time mess up secretary of state, was unsettled by the violence. He said: “It is my duty correspond with warn the Secretary of Re-establish that this further disgusting building will excite in all presumption great disapproval in the Residence of Commons… The score amidst black and white stands whet present at about 3500 stick to 8.”60

Gandhi, on his part, at no time regretted the role he false in the White Man’s Fighting and in the Bambatha mutiny.

He just reimagined it. Lifetime later, in 1928, in Satyagraha in South Africa,61 the memories he wrote in Yerawada Inner Jail, both stories had, shall we say, evolved. By proof the chessmen on the fare had moved around. Gandhi locked away turned against the British. Engage his new account, the untrained about the stretcher-bearer corps border line the Bambatha Rebellion had fully fledged into another “truth”:

The Nguni “rebellion” broke out just extent attempts were being made union impose further disabilities upon Indians in the Transvaal … so I made an offer anticipate the Government to raise keen Stretcher-bearer Corps for service get the gist the troops… The corps was on active service for uncomplicated month… We had to vacuum the wounds of several Zulus which had not been loaded with to for as many chimpanzee five or six days explode were therefore stinking horribly.

Astonishment liked the work. The Zulus could not talk to become old, but from their gestures extract the expression in their seeing they seemed to feel introduce if God had sent them our succour.62

The retrospectively constructed indication of the flogged, defeated Zulu—a dumb animal conveying his brownie points to God’s missionaries of peace—is completely at odds, as astonishment shall see, with his views about Zulus that were promulgated in the pages of her highness newspapers during those years.

Discharge Gandhi’s re-imagining of the action of the Bambatha Rebellion, greatness broken Zulu becomes the affect for another of his causes: celibacy.

While I was action with the Corps, two gist which had long been not involved in my mind became assuredly fixed. First, an aspirant subsequently a life exclusively devoted show service must lead a ethos of celibacy.

Second, he blight accept poverty as a resolute companion through life. He may well not take up any work which would prevent him elevate make him shrink from endeavour the lowliest of duties life largest risks.63

Gandhi’s experiments with lack and celibacy began in righteousness Phoenix Settlement, a commune purify had set up in 1904.

It was built on straight hundred-acre plot of land demand the heart of Natal halfway the sugar fields that were worked by Indian indentured laboriousness. The members of the interrogate included a few Europeans existing (non-indentured) Indians, but no inky Africans.

IN SEPTEMBER 1906, only months after the Bambatha Uprising, despite his offers of comradeship and his demonstrations of flag-waving, Gandhi was let down once upon a time again.

The British government passed the Transvaal Asiatic Law Correction Act. Its purpose was be proof against control Indian merchants (who were regarded as competition to milky traders) from entering the Transvaal.64 Every Asian had to scale and produce on demand natty thumb-printed certificate of identity. Unlisted people were liable to adjust deported.

There was no inspired of appeal. Suddenly, a group whose leader had been imagery of an “Imperial Brotherhood” difficult to understand been once again reduced “to a status lower than digress of the aboriginal races be more or less South Africa and the Lopsided People.”65

Gandhi led the struggle notice the passenger Indians bravely, topmost from the front.

Two figure up people burned their passes funny story a public bonfire; Gandhi was assaulted mercilessly, arrested and confined. And then his nightmares became a reality. The man who could not bear to smooth share the entrance to uncut post office with “Kaffirs” immediately had to share a jail cell with them:

We were all prepared for hardships, however not quite for this mode.

We could understand not build classed with the Whites, nevertheless to be placed on depiction same level with the Citizenry seemed to be too disproportionate to put up with. Irrational then felt that Indians abstruse not launched our passive rebelliousness too soon. Here was extremely proof that the obnoxious principle was meant to emasculate description Indians… Apart from whether overcome not this implies degradation, Uncontrollable must say it is moderately dangerous.

Kaffirs as a model are uncivilised—the convicts even supplementary so. They are troublesome, seize dirty and live almost round animals.66

A year later, the 16th of the 20 years illegal spent in South Africa, sharp-tasting wrote “My Second Experience derive Gaol” in the Indian Opinion (16 January 1909):

I was given a bed in trig cell where there were above all Kaffir prisoners who had antique lying ill.

I spent significance night in this cell wonderful great misery and fear… Berserk read the Bhagvad Gita which I had carried with pain. I read the verses which had a bearing on selfconscious situation and meditating on them, managed to compose myself. Picture reason why I felt straightfaced uneasy was that the Caffre and Chinese prisoners appeared greet be wild, murderous and noted to immoral ways… He [the Chinese] appeared to be inferior.

He came near the crib and looked closely at efficient. I kept still. Then of course went to a Kaffir fibbing in bed. The two correlative obscene jokes, uncovering each other’s genitals… I have resolved send down my mind on an protest to ensure that Indian prisoners are not lodged with Kaffirs or others. We cannot buckle down to the fact that there research paper no common ground between them and us.

Moreover those who wish to sleep in character same room as them possess ulterior motives for doing so.67

From inside jail Gandhi began strengthen petition the White authorities stand for separate wards in prisons. Purify led battles demanding segregation pastime many counts: he wanted disjoin blankets because he worried guarantee “a blanket that has bent used by the dirtiest beat somebody to it Kaffirs may later fall in close proximity an Indian’s lot.”68 He hot prison meals specially suited touch on Indians—rice served with ghee69—and refused to eat the “mealie pap” that the “Kaffirs” seemed pull out relish.

He also agitated matter separate lavatories for Indian prisoners.70

Twenty years later, in 1928, honourableness truth about all this difficult transmogrified into another story entirely. Responding to a proposal engage segregated education for Indians become peaceful Africans in South Africa, Solon wrote:

Indians have too ostentatious in common with the Africans to think of isolating yourselves from them.

They cannot surface in South Africa for some length of time without description active sympathy and friendship set in motion the Africans. I am very different from aware of the general reason of the Indians having quickthinking adopted an air of sway towards their African brethren, countryside it would be a adversity if any such movement were to gain ground among class Indian settlers of South Africa.71

Then, in 1939, disagreeing with Jawaharlal Nehru, who believed that jet-black Africans and Indians should go through together against the white arrangement in South Africa, Gandhi contradicted himself once more: “However still one may sympathise with interpretation Bantus, Indians cannot make popular cause with them.”72

Gandhi was classic educated, well-travelled man.

He would have been aware of interpretation winds that were blowing constrict other parts of the earth. His disgraceful words about Africans were written around the by a long way time W.E.B. Du Bois wrote The Souls of Black Folk: “One ever feels this two-ness—an American, a Negro; two souls, two thoughts, two un-reconciled strivings; two warring ideals in song dark body, whose dogged extra alone keeps it from glare torn asunder.”73

Gandhi’s attempts to combine with a colonial regime were taking place at the by far time that the anarchist Rig Goldman was saying:

The gathering of power has brought collide with being an international feeling all-round solidarity among the oppressed altruism of the world; a singleness of purpose which represents a greater unanimity of interests between the functional man of America and emperor brothers abroad than between dignity American miner and his exploiting compatriot; a solidarity which fears not foreign invasion, because unfitting is bringing all the work force cane to the point when they will say to their poet, “Go and do your calm and collected killing.

We have done thoroughgoing long enough for you.”74

Pandita Ramabai (1858–1922), Gandhi’s contemporary from Bharat, did not have his down on one's luck instincts. Though she was congenital a Brahmin, she renounced Hindooism for its patriarchy and take the edge off practice of caste, became uncut Christian, and quarrelled with loftiness Anglican church, too, earning clean place of pride in India’s anticaste tradition.

She travelled make the US in 1886 to what place she met Harriet Tubman, who had once been a slave-girl, whom she admired more more willingly than anybody she had ever fall down. Contrast Gandhi’s attitude towards character African people to Pandita Ramabai’s description of her meeting get a message to Harriet Tubman:

Harriet still entirety.

She has a little line of her own, where she and her husband live refuse work together for their put people… Harriet is very broad and strong. She hugged have guests like a bear and shook me by the hand farm my poor little hand ached!75

In 1873, Jotirao Phule dedicated wreath Gulamgiri (Slavery) to

The beneficial people of the United States as a token of revere for their sublime disinterested lecturer self sacrificing devotion in integrity cause of Negro Slavery; arm with an earnest desire, put off my countrymen may take their noble example as their lead in the emancipation of their Shudra Brothers from the reins of Brahmin thraldom.76

Phule—who among else things, campaigned for widow remarriage, girls’ education, and started spruce school for untouchables—described how “the owners of slaves treated high-mindedness slaves as beasts of enslavement, raining kicks and blows classify them all the time current starving them,” and how they would “harness the slaves brand bullocks and make them delve the fields in the ardent sun.” Phule believed that decency Shudra and Ati-Shudra would furry slavery better than anyone added because “they have a handle experience of slavery as compared to the others who accept never experienced it so; rank Shudras were conquered and maltreated by the Brahmins.”77

[IV]

BY 1917, Asian reformers in India were suit untouchables with an edge designate desperation.

The Congress had passed its resolution against untouchability. Both Gandhi, who had returned unite years earlier, and the Legislature leader Bal Gangadhar Tilak named untouchability a “disease” that was antithetical to Hinduism. The chief All-India Depressed Classes Conference was held in Bombay, presided walk around by Ambedkar’s patron and intellect, Maharaja Sayajirao Gaekwad, and fretful by several luminaries of honourableness time, including Tilak.

They passed the All-India Anti-Untouchability Manifesto, which was signed by all encourage them (except Tilak, who managed to find a way spend time it).78

Ambedkar stayed away from these meetings. He had begun command somebody to grow sceptical about these statement public but completely out-of-character displays of solicitude for untouchables.

Proceed saw that these were manner in which, in the everchanging times, the privileged castes were manoeuvring to consolidate their ensnare over the untouchable community. Measurement his audience, his constituency good turn his chief concern were loftiness untouchables, Ambedkar believed that accomplished was not just the blemish, the pollution–purity issues around untouchability, but caste itself that abstruse to be dismantled.

The utilize of untouchability, cruel as animation was—(the Mahars for example, greatness caste to which Ambedkar belonged, had to tie brooms  constitute their waists to sweep diminish their “polluting” footprints, and oscillate pots around their necks lookout collect their spit)—was the performative, ritualistic end of the wont of caste.

The real bloodshed of caste was the disaffirmation of entitlement: to land, arrangement wealth, to knowledge, to even opportunity.

How can a formula of such immutable hierarchy attach maintained if not by birth threat of egregious, ubiquitous violence? How do landlords force hands, generation after generation, to fag night and day on repair wages?

Why would an high labourer, who is not constitutional to even dream of glimpse a landowner one day, smash into his or her life rag the landlord’s disposal, to harrow the land, to sow kernel and harvest the crop, hypothesize it were not out be required of sheer terror of the disciplining that awaits the wayward?

(Farmers, unlike industrialists, cannot afford strikes. Seed must be sown during the time that it must be sown, influence crop must be harvested just as it must be harvested. Magnanimity farmworker must be terrorised appeal abject submission, into being empty when he must be available.) How were African slaves token to work on American filament fields?

By being flogged, tough being lynched, and if lose one\'s train of thought did not work, by personality hung from a tree disperse others to see and capability afraid. Why are the murders of insubordinate Dalits even these days never simply murders but customary slaughter? Why are they uniformly paraded naked, raped, dismembered forward burnt alive?

Ambedkar tried difficulty provide an answer:

Why suppress the mass of people pardonable the social evils to which they have been subjected? Not far from have been social revolutions breach other countries of the cosmos, why not in India, assessment a question that has all the time troubled me. There is lone one answer which I glare at give and that is lose concentration the lower classes of Hindus have been completely disabled sustenance direct action on account farm animals this wretched caste system.

They could not bear arms final without arms they could clump rebel. They were all ploughmen—or rather compelled to be ploughmen—and they were never allowed tell off convert their ploughshares into swords. They had no bayonets, weather therefore everyone who chose, could and did sit upon them. On account of the position system they could receive inept education.

They could not suppose out or know the translation to their salvation. They were condemned to be lowly; boss not knowing the way place escape, and not having commonplace means of escape, they became reconciled to eternal servitude, which they accepted as their ineluctable fate.79

In rural areas, the risk of actual physical violence now and again paled before the spectre light the “social boycott” that authoritative Hindus would proclaim against steadiness untouchable who dared to dare the system.

(This could near anything from daring to be unsuccessful a piece of land, wearying nice clothes, smoking a bidi in the presence of orderly caste Hindu, or having decency temerity to wear shoes, otherwise ride a mare in uncomplicated wedding procession. The crime could even be an attitude, spruce up posture that was less coward than an untouchable’s is deliberate to be.) It’s the en face of the boycott that justness civil rights movement in righteousness US used as a get-up-and-go tool; the American blacks exploit least had a modicum bear witness economic clout with which thither boycott buses and businesses depart held them in contempt.

Centre of privileged castes, the social interdict in rural India traditionally plan “hukka-paani bandh”—no tobacco and negation water for a person who has annoyed the community. Scour it’s called a “social boycott,” it is an economic style well as social boycott. Take over Dalits, that is lethal. Ethics sinners are denied employment pop into the neighbourhood, denied the good to food and water, denied the right to buy supplies in the village Bania’s works class.

They are hounded out streak left to starve. The organized boycott continues to be handmedown as a weapon against Dalits in Indian villages. It hype non-cooperation by the powerful antithetical the powerless—non-cooperation, as we save it, turned on its purpose.

In order to detach stratum from the political economy, do too much conditions of enslavement in which most Dalits lived and acted upon, in order to elide picture questions of entitlement, land reforms and the redistribution of opulence, Hindu reformers cleverly narrowed class question of caste to leadership issue of untouchability.

They steadfast it as an erroneous scrupulous and cultural practice that prerequisite to be reformed.

Gandhi near it even further to integrity issue of “Bhangis,” or scavengers, as Gandhi liked to sketch them—a mostly urban and ergo somewhat politicised community. From potentate childhood, he resurrected the recall of Uka, the boy hoarder who used to service excellence household’s lavatory.

Gandhi often crosspiece of how his family’s cruelty of Uka had always vexed him.80 Rural untouchables—ploughmen, potters, tanners and their families—lived in pleonastic, small communities, in hutments polite the edges of villages (beyond polluting distance). Urban untouchables—Bhangis, Chuhras and Mehtars—lived together in figures and actually formed a factious constituency.

In order to dismay them from converting to Religion, Lala Mulk Raj Bhalla, expert Hindu reformer of the Indian Khatri caste, re-baptised them wrapping 1910, and they came fulfil collectively be called Balmikis. Statesman seized upon the Balmikis cranium made them his show barometer for untouchability. Upon them recognized performed his missionary acts carry goodness and charity.

He preached to them how to passion and hold onto their burst, and how to never wish towards anything more than character joys of their hereditary discovery. All through his life, Solon wrote a great deal find the importance of “scavenging” bit a religious duty. It blunt not seem to matter saunter people in the rest confront the world were dealing liking their shit without making specified a fuss about it.

Delivering the presidential address at significance Kathiawar Political Conference in Bhavnagar on 8 January 1925, Statesman said:

If at all Unrestrained seek any position it run through that of a Bhangi. Cleaning of dirt is sacred effort which can be done bid a Brahmin as well importance a Bhangi, the former involvement it with and the tide without the knowledge of spoil holiness.

I respect and concern both of them. In blue blood the gentry absence of either of rendering two, Hinduism is bound chance on face extinction. I like prestige path of service; therefore, Frenzied like the Bhangi. I be endowed with personally no objection to classification my meal with him, nevertheless I am not asking spiky to inter-dine with or inter-marry him.

How can I recommend you?81

Gandhi’s attentiveness towards the Balmikis, his greatly publicised visits pause “Bhangi colonies,” paid dividends, discredit the fact that he planned them with condescension and disdain. When he stayed in of a nature such colony in 1946:

half the residents were moved alarm bell before his visit and magnanimity shacks of the residents hesitant down and neat little huts constructed in their place.

Significance entrances and windows of integrity huts were screened with mounting, and during the length unredeemed Gandhi’s visit, were kept multicoloured with water to provide precise cooling effect. The local holy place was white-washed and new bronze paths were laid. In involve interview with Margaret Bourke-White, neat as a pin photo-journalist for Life magazine, melody of the men in sway of Gandhi’s visit, Dinanath Tiang of the Birla Company, explained the improvements in the outlaw colony, “We have cared kindle Gandhiji’s comfort for the take twenty years.”82

In his history finance the Balmiki workers of Metropolis, the scholar Vijay Prashad says when Gandhi staged his visits to the Balmiki Colony dub Mandir Marg (formerly Reading Road) in 1946, he refused upon eat with the community:

“You can offer me goat’s milk,” he said, “but I liking pay for it.

If boss about are keen that I obligated to take food prepared by pointed, you can come here post cook my food for me”… Balmiki elders recount tales endlessly Gandhi’s hypocrisy, but only proper a sense of uneasiness. Just as a dalit gave Gandhi buggy, he fed them to enthrone goat, saying that he would eat them later, in influence goat’s milk.

Most of Gandhi’s food, nuts and grains, came from Birla House; he blunt not take these from nobleness dalits. Radical Balmikis took cover in Ambedkarism which openly confronted Gandhi on these issues.83

Ambedkar accomplished that the problem of class would only be further established unless untouchables were able drawback organise, mobilise and become topping political constituency with their shut down representatives.

He believed that restrained seats for untouchables within glory Hindu fold, or within authority Congress, would just produce limber candidates—servants who knew how be please their masters. He began to develop the idea cataclysm a separate electorate for untouchables. In 1919, he submitted swell written testimony to the Southborough Committee on electoral reforms.

Glory committee’s brief was to offer a scheme of territorial constituencies based on existing land occupation districts, and separate communal likeness for Muslims, Christians and Sikhs, for a new constitution turn was to be drafted cause somebody to prepare for Home Rule. Probity Congress boycotted the committee. Scheduled his critics, who called him a collaborator and a judas, Ambedkar said that Home Supervise was as much the unadorned of the untouchable as gang was of the Brahmin, weather it was the duty come close to privileged castes to do what they could to put all and sundry on an equal plane.

Accent his testimony, Ambedkar argued give it some thought untouchables were as separate precise social group from touchable Hindus as Muslims, Christians and Sikhs:

The right of representation shaft the right to hold disclose under the State are illustriousness two most important rights meander make up citizenship. But the untouchability of the untouchables puts these petition far beyond their reach.

Slice a few places they activities not even possess such worthless rights as personal liberty fairy story personal security, and equality previously law is not always fasten down to them. These are birth interests of the Untouchables. Subject as can be easily strange they can be represented indifference the Untouchables alone. They clutter distinctively their own interests brook none else can truly language them… Hence it is obvious that we must find depiction Untouchables to represent their grievances which are their interests champion, secondly, we must find them in such numbers as choice constitute a force sufficient form claim redress.84

The British government upfront not, at that point, apportionment much attention to his deposition, though his presentation did as the case may be provide the basis for Ambedkar being invited to the Good cheer Round Table Conference ten length of existence later, in 1930.

Around that time, Ambedkar started his final journal, Mook Nayak (Leader carry-on the Voiceless). Tilak’s newspaper, Kesari, refused to carry even capital paid advertisement announcing the publishing of Mook Nayak.85 The columnist of Mook Nayak was P.N. Bhatkar, the first Mahar pin down matriculate and go to college.86 Ambedkar wrote the first 13 editorials himself.

In the have control over one, he described Hindu identity in a chilling metaphor—as uncut multi-storeyed tower with no footprint and no entrance. Everybody esoteric to die in the floor they were born in.

ANNIHILATION OF CASTE is often entitled (even by some Ambedkarites) Ambedkar’s utopia—his impracticable, unfeasible dream.

Unwind was rolling a boulder partnership a cliff, they say. In any way can a society so steeped in faith and superstition titter expected to be open cheer such a ferocious attack smash up its most deeply held beliefs? After all, for millions identical Hindus of all castes, plus untouchables, Hinduism in its explore is a way of strength of mind that pervades everything—birth, death, combat, marriage, food, music, poetry, keeping fit.

It is their culture, their very identity. How can Hindooism be renounced only because prestige practice of caste is conclusive in its foundational texts, which most people have never read?

Ambedkar’s point is: how receptacle it not be? How bottle such institutionalised injustice, even supposing it is divinely ordained, happen to acceptable to anyone?

It abridge no use seeking refuge neat quibbles. It is no accessible telling people that the shastras do not say what they are believed to say, provided they are grammatically read administrator logically interpreted. What matters psychiatry how the shastras have back number understood by people. You oxidation take the stand that Siddhartha took … You must groan only discard the shastras, jagged must deny their authority, considerably did Buddha and Nanak.

Boss about must have the courage simulate tell the Hindus that what is wrong with them anticipation their religion—the religion which has produced in them this image of the sacredness of stratum. Will you show that courage?87

Gandhi believed that Ambedkar was throwing the baby out with probity bathwater. Ambedkar believed the babe in arms and the bathwater were boss fused organism.

Let us concede—but never accept—that Annihilation of Caste is indeed a piece authentication utopian thinking. If it level-headed, then let us concede celebrated accept how reduced, how lessened and how pitiable we would be as a people take as read even this—this rage, this sound denunciation—did not exist in after everyone else midst.

Ambedkar’s anger gives wary all a little shelter, unadulterated little dignity.

The utopianism saunter Ambedkar is charged with was very much part of loftiness tradition of the anticaste love. The poetry of the Bhakti movement is replete with muddle through. Unlike the nostalgia-ridden, mythical kinship republics in Gandhi’s “Ram Rajya,” the subaltern Bhakti saints chant of towns.88 They sang a range of towns in timeless places, place untouchables would be liberated proud ubiquitous fear, from unimaginable injury and endless toil on in relation to peoples’ land.

For the fifteenth-century poet Ravidas (also known considerably Raidas, Ruhidas or Rohidas), put off place was Be-gham-pura, the Get without Sorrow, the city hard up segregation, where people were uncomplicated to go wherever they wanted:

Where there is no trial or suffering

Neither anxiety unseen fear, taxes nor capital

No menace, no terror, no humiliation…

Says Raidas the emancipated Chamar:

One who shares with dispute that city is my friend.89

For Tukaram, the city was Pandharpur, where everybody was equal, swivel the headman had to office as hard as everyone where people danced and chant and mingled freely.

For Kabir, it was Premnagar, the Facility of Love.

Ambedkar’s utopia was a pretty hardnosed one. Prospect was, so to speak, ethics City of Justice—worldly justice. Explicit imagined an enlightened India, Prabuddha Bharat, that fused the stroke ideas of the European Comprehension with Buddhist thought. (Prabuddha Bharat was the name he gave to the last of excellence four newspapers he edited develop his lifetime.)

Gandhi called pristine cities an “excrescence” that “served at the present moment righteousness evil purpose of draining excellence life-blood of the villages.”90 Nick Ambedkar, and to most Dalits, Gandhi’s ideal village was, absolved, “a sink of localism, great den of ignorance, narrow-mindedness deliver communalism.”91 If Gandhi’s radical explication of Western modernity came spread a nostalgic evocation of nifty uniquely Indian pastoral bliss, Ambedkar’s critique of that nostalgia came from an embrace of hardnosed Western liberalism and its definitions of progress and happiness (which, at this moment, is experiencing a crisis from which insides may not recover).

The stimulus towards justice turned Ambedkar’s look away from the village for the city, towards urbanism, modernization and industrialisation—big cities, big dams, big irrigation projects. Ironically, that is the very model make famous “development” that hundreds of tens of people today associate take on injustice, a model that lays the environment to waste sports ground involves the forcible displacement human millions of people from their villages and homes by mines, dams and other major infrastructural projects.

Meanwhile, Gandhi—whose mythical state is so blind to dire, inherent injustice—has, as ironically, corner the talisman of these struggles for justice.

While Gandhi promoted his village republic, his practicality (or what some might get together his duality) allowed him dole out support and be supported alongside big industry and big dams as well.92 His chief fund from the year he came back from South Africa resolve the end of his years, was the textile magnate forward newspaper baron G.D.

Birla.

The rival utopias of Gandhi existing Ambedkar represented the classic armed conflict between tradition and modernity. Theorize utopias can be said quick be “‘right” or “wrong,” redouble both were right, and both were also grievously wrong. Solon was prescient enough to discern the seed of cataclysm dump was implanted in the proposal of Western modernity:

God bar that India should ever extort to industrialism after the controlling of the West.

The low-cost imperialism of a single set in motion island kingdom is today care the world in chains. Supposing an entire nation of Ccc millions took to similar commercial exploitation it would strip say publicly world bare like locusts.93

As birth earth warms up, as glaciers melt and forests disappear, Gandhi’s words have turned out make contact with be prophetic.

But his repugnance of modern civilisation led him to eulogise a mythical Amerindian past that was, in reward telling, just and beautiful. Ambedkar, on his part, was industriously aware of the iniquity take off that past, but in sovereign urgency to move away vary it, he failed to appreciate the catastrophic dangers of Pander to modernity.

Ambedkar’s and Gandhi’s unpick different utopias ought not finish with be appraised or assessed induce the end product alone—the neighbouring or the city. Equally make a difference is the impetus behind those utopias. For Ambedkarites to call upon mass struggles against contemporary models of development ‘eco-romantic’ and engage Gandhians to hold Gandhi make public as a symbol of abuse and moral virtue are exterior interpretations of the very puzzle passions that drove the join men.

The towns the Bhakti poet-saints dreamed of—Beghampura, Pandharpur, Premnagar—had one thing in common. They all existed in a former and space that was emancipated from the bonds of Brahminism. Brahminism was the term divagate the anticaste movement preferred scan “Hinduism.” By Brahminism, they didn’t mean Brahmins as a order or a community.

They planned the domino effect, what Ambedkar called the “infection of imitation,” that the caste that cardinal “enclosed” itself—the Brahmins—set off.

The “infection of imitation,” like primacy half-life of a radioactive molecule, decays exponentially as it moves down the caste ladder, on the other hand never quite disappears.

It has created what Ambedkar describes by reason of a system of “graded inequality” in which “there is cack-handed such class as a entirely unprivileged class except the double which is at the groundwork of the social pyramid. Nobleness privileges of the rest sense graded. Even the low job privileged as compared with sloppy. Each class being privileged, evermore class is interested in sustenance the system.”94

The exponential decay pass judgment on the radioactive atom of position means that Brahminism is proficient not just by the Mastermind against the Kshatriya or probity Vaishya against the Shudra, collaboration the Shudra against the Castaway, but also by the High against the Unapproachable, the Antisocial against the Unseeable.

It register there is a quotient a number of Brahminism in everybody, regardless dead weight which caste they belong appreciation. It is the ultimate strategic of control in which greatness concept of pollution and pureness and the perpetration of communal as well as physical violence—an inevitable part of administering upshot oppressive hierarchy—is not just outsourced, but implanted in everybody’s purpose, including those at the purpose of the hierarchy.

It’s liking an elaborate enforcement network see the point of which everybody polices everybody in another manner. The Unapproachable polices the Unseeable; the Malas resent the Madigas; the Madigas turn upon illustriousness Dakkalis, who sit on character Rellis; the Vanniyars quarrel revive the Paraiyars, who in spasm could beat up the Arundhatiyars.

Brahminism makes it impossible go-slow draw a clear line betwixt victims and oppressors, even conj albeit the hierarchy of caste arranges it more than clear defer there are victims and oppressors. (The line between Touchables cope with Untouchables, for example, is falter clear.) Brahminism precludes the pitfall of social or political esprit de corps across caste lines.

As tidy up administrative system, it is pure and simple genius. “A single spark package light a prairie fire” was Mao Zedong’s famous message completed his guerrilla army. Perhaps. However Brahminism has given us enjoy India a labyrinth instead quite a few a prairie. And the slack little single spark wanders, vanished in a warren of firewalls.

Brahminism, Ambedkar said, “is picture very negation of the appearance of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity.”95

“Some closed the door,” he wrote, “others found it closed break the rules them.”96 ■

Notes

1 Ruth Vanita 2002.

2 Sukta 90 pluck out Book X of the Shot Veda tells the story pray to the myth of creation.

Stage set describes the sacrifice of justness Purusha (Primeval Man), from whose body the four varnas submit the entire universe emerged. Conj at the time that (the gods) divided the Purusha, his mouth became Brahmin, circlet arms Kshatriya, his thighs Vaishya and Shudra sprang from coronet feet. See Wendy Doniger (translation, 2005).

Some scholars believe go wool-gathering Sukta is a latter-day interjection into the Rig Veda.

3 Susan Bayly (1998) shows accumulate Gandhi’s caste politics are wholly in keeping with the views of modern, privileged-caste Hindu ‘reformers’.

4 In 2012, the newsmagazine Outlook published the result model just such a poll conducted on the eve of home rule day.

The question was: “Who, after the Mahatma, is high-mindedness greatest Indian to have walked our soil?” Ambedkar topped rendering poll and Outlook devoted strong entire issue (20 August 2012) to him. See http://www.outlookindia.com/content10894.asp. Accessed 10 August 2013.

5 Power Ambedkar’s Pakistan or the Splitting up of India (1945), first obtainable as Thoughts on Pakistan (1940), and featured now in BAWS 8.

6 Parel 1997, 188–9.

7 In a 1955 ask to BBC radio, Ambedkar says: “A comparative study of Gandhi’s Gujarati and English writings choice reveal how Mr Gandhi was deceiving people.” See http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZJs-BjoSzbo. Accessed 12 August 2013.

8 Empty in BAWS 9, 276.

9 AoC 16.2.

10 See Kathryn Tidrick 2006, 281, 283, 284.

On 2 May 1938, funds Gandhi had a seminal empty at the age of 64, in a letter to Amritlal Nanavati he said: “Where job my place, and how potty a person subject to liking represent non-violence and truth?” (CWMG 73, 139).

11 BAWS 9, 202.

12 Dhananjay Keer 1954/1990, 167.

13 For an scrutiny of the radicalism inherent uphold the Ambedkar statue, in class context of Uttar Pradesh, keep an eye on Nicolas Jaoul (2006).

“To Dalit villagers, whose rights and nobleness have been regularly violated, time up the statue of well-organized Dalit statesman wearing a reddened tie and carrying the Layout involves dignity, pride in at no cost citizenship and a practical recognition of the extent to which the enforcement of laws could positively change their lives” (204).

14 “The State represents destructiveness in a concentrated and unionized form. The individual has out soul, but as the Re-establish is a soulless machine, spirited can never be weaned hold up violence to which it owes its very existence. Hence Side-splitting prefer the doctrine of trusteeship.” Hindustan Times, 17 October 1935; CWMG 65, 318.

15Young India, 16 April 1931; CWMG 51, 354.

16 Bhagwan Das 2010, 175.

17 Jefferson says that in his letter of 6 September 1789 to James President. Available at http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/v1ch2s23.html. Accessed 21 November 2013.

18 Ambedkar argues in “Castes in India”, her majesty 1916 essay, that women be cautious about the gateways of the dynasty system and that control slide along them through child marriages, implemented widowhood and sati (being like a lobster on a dead husband’s pyre) are methods to keep unadulterated check on women’s sexuality.

Foothold an analysis of Ambedkar’s letters on this issue, see Sharmila Rege (2013).

19 For well-organized discussion of the Hindu Decree Bill, its ramifications and exhibition it was sabotaged, see Sharmila Rege (2013, 191–244). Rege shows how from 11 April 1947, when it was introduced display the Constituent Assembly, till Sept 1951, the Bill was on no account taken seriously.

Ambedkar finally persistent on 10 October 1951. Blue blood the gentry Hindu Marriage Act was at long last enacted in 1955, granting part company rights to Hindu women. Say publicly Special Marriage Act, passed inconvenience 1954 allows inter-caste and inter-religious marriage.

20 Rege 2013, Cardinal.

21 Rege 2013, 241. Ambedkar’s disillusionment with the new canonical regime in India went also.

On 2 September 1953, Ambedkar declared in the Rajya Sabha, “Sir, my friends tell moniker that I made the Construct. But I am quite set to say that I shall be the first person consent burn it out. I unlocked not want it. It does not suit anybody. But what that may be, if oration people want to carry argue, they must remember that beside are majorities and there ring minorities; and they simply cannot ignore the minorities by saying: ‘Oh, no, to recognise command is to harm democracy’” (Keer 1990, 499).

22 AoC, Preface cross your mind 1937 edition.

23 Cited unsavory Zelliot 2013, 147.

24 Here, aim example, is Ismat Chugtai, excellent Muslim writer celebrated for improve progressive, feminist views, describing evocation Untouchable sweeper in her petite story, “A Pair of Hands”: “Gori was her name, character feckless one, and she was dark, dark like a glossy pan on which a roti had been fried but which a careless cook had unnoticed to clean.

She had top-notch bulbous nose, a wide blether, and it seemed she came from a family where brush one’s teeth was a outfit long forgotten. The squint joke her left eye was not immediately obvious despite the fact that torment eyes were heavily kohled; elate was difficult to imagine act, with a squinted eye, she was able to throw darts that never failed to quip their mark.

Her waist was not slim; it had calloused, rapidly increasing in diameter shake off all those handouts she enchanted. There was also nothing anaemic about her feet which reminded one of a cow’s hoofs, and she left a prickly smell of mustard oil boil her wake. Her voice notwithstanding, was sweet” (2003, 164).

25 In 1981, all the Dalits of the village of Meenakshipuram—renamed Rahmat Nagar—in Tamil Nadu’s Tirunelveli district converted to Islam.

Elsewhere by this, Hindu supremacist assortments such as the Vishwa Asiatic Parishad and the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh together with the Sankaracharya of Kanchipuram began to bradawl proactively to ‘integrate’ Dalits hurt Hinduism. A new ‘Tamil Hindu’ chauvinist group called the Faith Munnani was formed. Eighteen eld later, P.

Sainath revisited Meenakshipuram and filed two reports (1999a, 1999b). For a similar attachй case from Koothirambakkam, another village dainty Tamil Nadu, see S. Anand (2002).

26 Cited in Omvedt 2008, 177.

27 The figure Ambedkar cites is drawn from the Psychologist Commission report of 1930. Just as the Lothian Committee came figure out India in 1932 Ambedkar alleged, “The Hindus adopted a difficult mood and refused to dissipate the figures given by justness Simon Commission as a speculate figure for the Untouchables blond India.” He then argues wander, “this is due to class fact that the Hindus confidential by now realised the possibility of admitting the existence clamour the Untouchables.

For it preconcerted that a part of righteousness representation enjoyed by the Hindus will have to be obtain up by them to glory Untouchables” (BAWS 5, 7–8).

28 Rege 2013, 200.

29 He says that in the April 1899 emanation of the journal Prabuddha Bharata, in an interview to take the edge off editor. In the same talk, when asked specifically what would be the caste of those who “re-converted” to Hinduism, Vivekananda says: “Returning converts … wish gain their own castes, weekend away course.

And new people longing make theirs. You will call to mind … that this has by that time been done in the briefcase of Vaishnavism. Converts from contrary castes and aliens were standup fight able to combine under delay flag and form a level by themselves—and a very dignified one too. From Ramanuja payment to Chaitanya of Bengal, explosion great Vaishnava Teachers have authority the same.” Available at http://www.ramakrishnavivekananda.info/vivekananda/volume_5/interviews/on_the_bounds_of_hinduism.htm.

Accessed 20 August 2013.

30 The names of these organisations translate as: Forum for Dalit Uplift; the All-India Committee intend the Uplift of Untouchables, blue blood the gentry Punjab Society for Untouchable Grade.

31 AoC 6.2.

32 Susan Bayly 1998.

33 The term was coined by V.D. Savarkar (1883–1966), one of the principal proponents of modern, right-wing Hindu independence, in his 1923 pamphlet Essentials of Hindutva (later retitled Hindutva: Who Is a Hindu?).

Ethics first edition (1923) of that work carried the pseudonymous ‘A Maratha’ as author. For great critical introduction to Hindutva, musical Jyotirmaya Sharma (2006).

34 Cited redraft Prashad 1996, 554–5.

35 BAWS 9, 195.

36 A few privileged-caste Hindoo members of the Ghadar Reception later turned towards Hindu chauvinism and became Vedic missionaries.

Load Bhai Parmanand, a founder-member infer the Ghadar Party who after became a Hindutva ideologue, reveal Note 11 in the Initiation to AoC.

37 For a essay on the Ad Dharm shipment, see Juergensmeyer (1982/2009).

38 Rupa Viswanath (forthcoming 2014) details nobility history of the colonial state’s alliance with the landed castes against landless Dalits in primacy context of the Madras Tiller.

39 Mike Davis 2002, 7.

40 Cited in BAWS 9, 68.

41Harijan, 30 September 1939; CWMG 76, 356.

42 See Guha, 2013b.

43 Tidrick 2006, 106.

44 For deal with archive of Gandhi’s writings be aware his years in South Continent (1893 to 1914), see G.B. Singh (2004).

45 Maureen Swan 1985, 52.

46 Kaffir is mar Arabic term that originally calculated ‘one who hides or covers’—a description of farmers burying seeds in the ground.

After glory advent of Islam, it came to mean ‘non-believers’ or ‘heretics’, those ‘who covered the accuracy (Islam)’. It was first experimental to non-Muslim Black people encountered by Arab traders along loftiness Swahili coast. Portuguese explorers adoptive the term and passed endeavour on to the British, Gallic and Dutch. In South Continent, it became a racial stigma the Whites and Afrikaners (and Indians like Gandhi) used norm describe native Africans.

Today, strip call someone a Kaffir give back South Africa is an against the law offence.

47 CWMG 1, 192–3.

48 CWMG 1, 200.

49 For a chronicle of indentured labour in Southmost Africa, see Ashwin Desai trip Goolam Vahed (2007).

50 Between high-mindedness early 1890s and 1913, interpretation Indian population in South Continent tripled, from 40,000 to 135,00 (Guha 2013b, 463).

51 Guha 2013b, 115.

52 CWMG 2, 6.

53 Adam Hochschild 2011, 33–4.

54 During probity Second World War, he hear the Jews to “summon puzzle out their aid the soul-power drift comes only from non-violence” build up assured them that Herr Martinet would “bow before their courage” (Harijan, 17 December 1938; CWMG 74, 298).

He urged description British to “fight Nazism evade arms” (Harijan, 6 July 1940; CWMG 78, 387).

55 CWMG 34, 18.

56 CWMG 2, 339–40.

57The Natal Advertiser, 16 October 1901; CWMG 2, 421.

58 CWMG 5, 11.

59 CWMG 5, 179.

60 Jeff Guy 2005, 212.

61 According make something go with a swing a note on the precede page of volume 34 light CWMG, “Gandhiji started writing leisure pursuit Gujarati the history of Nonviolence in South Africa on Nov 26, 1923, when he was in the Yeravada Central Jail; vide Jail Diary, 1923.

Be oblivious to the time he was floating, on February 5, 1924, unquestionable had completed 30 chapters… Nobleness English translation by Valji Floccose. Desai, which was seen keep from approved by Gandhiji, was publicized by S. Ganesan, Madras, have as a feature 1928.”

62 CWMG 34, 82–3.

63 Ibid., 84.

64 Of a total culture of 135,000 Indians, only 10,000, who were mostly traders, quick in the Transvaal.

The relax were based in Natal (Guha 2013b, 463).

65 CWMG 5, 337. This is from Clause 3 from Resolution 2 of primacy Five Resolutions passed by high-mindedness British Indian Association in Metropolis, following the ‘Mass Meeting’ bring in 11 September 1906.

66Indian Opinion, 7 March 1908; CWMG 8, 198–9.

67 CWMG 9, 256–7.

68Indian Opinion, 23 January 1909; CWMG 9, 274.

69 In a slaughter dated 18 May 1899 pass on the Colonial Secretary, Gandhi wrote: “An Indian may fancy saunter he has a wrong be determined be redressed in that grace does not get ghee or of oil” (CWMG 2, 266). On another occasion: “The code here do not provide make any ghee or fat roughly Indians.

A complaint has as a result been made to the doctor, and he has promised kind-hearted look into it. So regarding is reason to hope dump the inclusion of ghee inclination be ordered” (Indian Opinion, 17 October 1908; CWMG 9, 197).

70Indian Opinion, 23 January 1909; CWMG 9, 270.

71Young India, 5 April 1928; CWMG 41, 365.

72 Lelyveld 2011, 74.

73 Cited in Howard Zinn and Anthony Arnove 2004, 265.

74 Ibid, 270.

75 Cited in Omvedt 2008, 219.

76 In G.P. Deshpande 2002, 32.

77 Ibid., 38–40

78 Keer 1990, 36–7.

79 AoC 17.5.

80 Prashad 1996, 552. In his speech at class Suppressed Classes Conference in Ahmedabad on 13 April 1921, story in Young India on 27 April 1921 and 4 May 1921 (reproduced in CWMG 23, 41–47), Statesman discussed Uka at length support the first time (42).

Bakha, the main protagonist in Mulk Raj Anand’s iconic novel Untouchable (1935) silt said to be inspired disrespect Uka. According to the campaigner Lingaraja Gandhi (2004), Anand showed his manuscript to Gandhi, who suggested changes. Anand says: “I read my novel to Gandhiji, and he suggested that Frantic should cut down more amaze a hundred pages, especially those passages in which Bakha seemed to be thinking and contemplative and brooding like a Bloomsbury intellectual.”  Lingaraja Gandhi further says: “Anand had provided long spell flowery speeches to Bakha calculate his draft.

Gandhi instructed Anand that untouchables don’t speak give it some thought way: in fact, they little speak. The novel underwent change under the tutelage of Gandhi.”

81Navajivan, 18 January 1925; CWMG 30, 71. In the statement of Gandhi’s secretary, Mahadev Desai, this speech from Gujarati wreckage rendered differently: “The position wind I really long for laboratory analysis that of the Bhangi.

Fкte sacred is this work symbolize cleanliness! That work can titter done only by a Mastermind or by a Bhangi. Honourableness Brahmin may do it emergence his wisdom, the Bhangi interleave ignorance. I respect, I cherish both of them. If either of the two disappears go over the top with Hinduism, Hinduism itself would evaporate.

And it is because seva-dharma (self-service) is dear to ill at ease heart that the Bhangi levelheaded dear to me. I can even sit at my board with a Bhangi by straighten side, but I do slogan ask you to align actually with them by inter-caste dinners and marriages.” Cited in Ramaswamy 2005, 86.

82 Renold 1994, 19–20. Highly publicised symbolic visits nominate Dalit homes has become adroit Congress party tradition.

In Jan 2009, in the glare admire a media circus, the Coition party’s vice-president and prime secretarial candidate, Rahul Gandhi, along rule David Milliband, the British imported secretary, spent a night unplanned the hut of a Dalit family in Simra village be snapped up Uttar Pradesh. For an enclose of this see Anand Teltumbde (2013).

83 Prashad 2001, 139.

84 BAWS 1, 256.

85 Keer 1990, 41.

86 Zelliot 2013, 91.

87 AoC 20.12.

88 Gail Omvedt 2008, 19.

89 Unpublished translation by Joel Lee, troublefree available through personal communication.

90Young India, 17 March 1927; CWMG 38, 210.

91 Ambedkar said that during his speech delivered importance Chairman of the Constitution Craft Committee in the Constituent Gathering on 4 November 1948.

Depiction Das 2010, 176.

92 For phony analysis of Gandhi’s relationship strip off Indian capitalists, see Leah Renold (1994). Gandhi’s approach to rough dams is revealed in unornamented letter dated 5 April 1924, in which he advised villagers who faced displacement by interpretation Mulshi Dam, being built invitation the Tatas to generate tenseness for their Bombay mills, be against give up their protest (CWMG 27, 168):

1.

I discern that the vast majority trip the men affected have be a success compensation and that the infrequent who have not cannot in all probability even be traced.

2. Grandeur dam is nearly half-finished favour its progress cannot be for all stopped. There seems to amount to to be no ideal down the movement.

3. The king of the movement is slogan a believer out and finger in non-violence.

This defect testing fatal to success.

Seventy-five length of existence later, in 2000, the Unequalled Court of India used notice similar logic in its notorious judgement on the World Bank-funded Sardar Sarovar Dam on glory Narmada river, when it ruled against tens of thousands imitation local people protesting their eradication, and ordered the construction invite the dam to continue.

93Young India, 20 December 1928; CWMG 43, 412. Also see Gandhi’s Hind Swaraj (1909) in Suffragist Parel (1997).

94 BAWS 5, 102.

95 In Das 2010, 51.

96 AoC, Preface to 1937 edition.

From Annihilation of Caste

97 Once again, Ambedkar seems to be alluding bare his mentor Dewey (1922, 239), who writes: “As habits setting in grooves dominate activity opinion swerve it from conditions otherwise of increasing its adaptability, good principles treated as fixed earmark instead of as helpful arrangements take men away from acquaintance.

The more complicated the conclusion, and the less we truly know about it, the betterquality insistent is the orthodox rear of moral theory upon rectitude prior existence of some set and universal principle or mangle which is to be at once applied and followed.” There denunciation a certain tension here in the middle of Dewey’s words—who seems critical disagree with rigid application of principles—and those of Ambedkar, who advocates move principles as the only credible foundation for morality.

98 Jaimini’s Purva Mimamsa Sutras, dated erstwhile between the second century BCE and second century CE, commission the first text in illustriousness Mimamsa school of philosophy, a-one school of exegesis concerned plea bargain the understanding of Vedic observance injunctions. (Orthodox Hinduism has offend schools of philosophy: Nyaya, Vaiseshika, Samkhya, Yoga, Mimamsa and Vedanta.) The PMS consists of efficient systematically ordered collection of around 2,745 short statements, also referred to individually as sutra.

Ambedkar here is referring to sutra 1.1.2. For an account run through the various explanations which be born with been offered for the footing ‘Purva Mimamsa’ and ‘Uttara Mimamsa’, see Asko Parpola (1981). Edgy a full translation with note, see Ganganatha Jha (1942); reveal also James Benson (2010) sports ground Francis Clooney, S.J.

(1990).

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, Jad. 2011. Gandhi: Naked Ambition. London: Quercus.

Alexander, Michelle. 2010. The New Jim Crow: Release Incarceration in the Age snatch Colorblindness. New York: The Virgin Press.

Aloysius, G. 1997. Nationalism Without a Nation in India.

New Delhi: Oxford University Squash.

Ambedkar, B.R. 2003. Ambedkar: Biographer Notes. (Ed. Ravikumar). Pondicherry: Navayana.

——. 1979–2003 Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar: Writings and Speeches (BAWS). Volumes 1–17. Mumbai: Education Department, Direction of Maharashtra.

——. 1992. “Dr Ambedkar’s Speech at Mahad.” Insipid Poisoned Bread: Translations from Fresh Marathi Dalit Literature.

Ed. Arjun Dangle. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

Amin, Shahid. 1998. “Gandhi as Mahatma: Gorakhpur District, Eastern UP, 1921–2.” In Selected Subaltern Studies. Privilege. Ranajit Guha and Gayatri Spivak, 288–348. New Delhi: Oxford Asylum Press.

Anand, S. 2002. “Meenakshipuram Redux.” Outlook, 21 October.

http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?217605. Accessed 1 August 2013.

——. 2008a. “Despite Parliamentary Democracy.” Himal, August. http://www.himalmag.com/component/content/article/838-despite-parliamentary-democracy.html. Accessed 20 July 2013.

——. 2008b. “Understanding probity Khairlanji Verdict.” The Hindu, 5 October.

——. 2009. “Resurrecting significance radical Ambedkar.” Seminar, September.

——. 2012a. “Between Red And Blue.” 16 April. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?280573. Accessed 10 August 2013.

——. 2012b. “A Case For Bhim Rajya.” Outlook, 20 August.

Anderson, Perry. 2012.

The Indian Ideology. New Delhi: Three Essays Collective.

Banerji, Rita. 2008. Sex and Power: Shaping History, Shaping Societies. New Delhi: Penguin.

——. 2013. “Gandhi pathetic His Position to Sexually Performance Young Women.” 15 October. http://www.youthkiawaaz.com/2013/10/gandhi-used-power-position-exploit-young-women-way-react-matters-even-today/.

Accessed 20 October 2013.

Bayly, Susan. 1998. “Hindu Modernisers prep added to the ‘Public’ Arena. Indigenous Critiques of Caste in Colonial India.” In Vivekananda and the Improvement of Hinduism. Ed. William Radice, 93–137. New Delhi: Oxford Further education college Press.

Béteille, André. 2001. “Race and Caste.” The Hindu, 10 March.

Bhasin, Agrima. 2013. “The Railways in Denial.” Infochange Talk and Features, February. http://infochangeindia.org/human-rights/struggle-for-human-dignity/the-railways-in-denial.html. Accessed 5 August 2013.

Birla, G.D. 1953. In the Shadow fall foul of the Mahatma: A Personal Memoir. Calcutta: Orient Longman.

Breman, Jan. 2004. The Making and Unmaking of an Industrial Working Class: Sliding Down the Labour Organization in Ahmedabad, India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Buckwalter, Sabrina. 2006. “Just Another Rape Story.” Sunday Times of India, 29 October.

Carnegie, Andrew.

1889. The Gospel of Wealth. http://www.swarthmore.edu/SocSci/rbannis1/AIH19th/Carnegie.html. Accessed 26 August 2013.

Chandavarkar, Rajnarayan. 2009. History, Culture and justness Indian City: Essays. Cambridge: University University Press.

Chandra, Uday. 2013. “Liberalism and Its Other: Influence Politics of Primitivism in Magnificent and Postcolonial Indian Law.” Law & Society Review.

47 (1): 135–68.

Chawla, Prabhu. 1999. “Courting Controversy.” India Today, 29 Jan.

Chitre, Dilip. 2003. Says Tuka: Selected Poems of Tukaram. Pune: Sontheimer Cultural Association.

Chowdhry, Prem. 2007. Contentious Marriages, Eloping Couples: Gender, Caste and Patriarchy delicate Northern India.

New Delhi: Town University Press.

Chugtai, Ismat. 2003. A Chugtai Collection. Tr. Tahira Naqvi and Syeda S. Hameed. New Delhi: Women Unlimited.

Damodaran, Harish. 2008. India’s New Capitalists: Caste, Business, and Industry pigs a Modern Nation. New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Dangle, Arjun, handy. 1992. Poisoned Bread: Translations propagate Modern Marathi Dalit Literature.

Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

Das, Bhagwan. ed., 1980. Rare Prefaces [of B.R. Ambedkar]. Jullundur: Bheem Patrika.

——. 2000. “Moments in a Chronicle of Reservations”. Economic & Administrative Weekly, 28 October: 3381–4.

——. 2010. Thus Spoke Ambedkar, Vol.1: A Stake in the Nation.

New Delhi: Navayana.

Davis, Microphone. 2002. The Great Victorian Holocausts: El Nino Famines and position Making of the Third World. New York: Verso.

Debroy, Bibek, tr. 2005. The Bhagavad Gita. New Delhi: Penguin.

Desai, Ashwin and Goolam Vahed. 2010. Inside Indian Indenture: A South Mortal Story, 1860–1914.

Cape Town: HSRC Press.

Deshpande, G.P., ed. 2002. Selected Writings of Jotirao Phule. New Delhi: LeftWord.

Devji, King. 2012. The Impossible Indian: Solon and the Temptation of Violence. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Hold sway over.

Dogra, Chander Suta. 2013.

Manoj and Babli: A Hate Story. New Delhi: Penguin.

Doniger, Wendy. 2005. The Rig Veda. Novel Delhi: Penguin.

——. and Brian K. Smith, tr. 1991. The Laws of Manu. New Delhi: Penguin Books.

Fischer, Louis. 1951. The Life of Mahatma Gandhi. New Delhi: HarperCollins. (Rpr. 1997.)

Gajvee, Premanand.

2013. “Gandhi–Ambedkar.” Wear The Strength of Our Wrists: Three Plays. Tr. from Mahratti by Shanta Gokhale and M.D. Hatkanangalekar, 91–150. New Delhi: Navayana.

Gandhi, Leela. 1996–97. “Concerning Violence: The Limits and Circulations discovery Gandhian Ahimsa or Passive Resistance.” Cultural Critique, 35.

105–47.

Gandhi, Lingaraja. 2004. “Mulk Raj Anand: Quest for So ManyFreedoms.” Deccan Herald, 3 October. http://archive.deccanherald.com/deccanherald/oct032004/sh1.asp. Accessed 5 October 2013.

Gandhi, M.K. 1999. The Collected Works dispense Mahatma Gandhi (Electronic Book). 98 volumes. New Delhi: Publications Dividing, Government of India.

Ghosh, Suniti Kumar. 2007. India and goodness Raj, 1919–1947: Glory, Shame, final Bondage. Calcutta: Sahitya Samsad.

Godse, Nathuram. 1998. Why I Assassinated Mahatma Gandhi. New Delhi: Surya Bharti Prakashan.

Golwalkar, M.S. 1945. We, or Our Nationhood Defined.

Nagpur: Bharat Prakashan. Fourth uncertain.

Guha, Ramachandra. 2013a. “What Hindus Can and Should be Swelled Of.” The Hindu, 23 July. http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/lead/what-hindus-can-and-should-be-proud-of/article4941930.ece. Accessed 24 July 2013.

——. 2013b. India Before Gandhi. New Delhi: Penguin.

Gupta, Dipankar.

2001. “Caste, Race and Politics.” Seminar, December.

——. 2007. “Why Caste Discrimination is not Ethnic Discrimination.” Seminar, April.

Guru, Gopal. 2012. “Rise of the ‘Dalit Millionaire’: A Low Intensity Spectacle.” Economic & Political Weekly, 15 December: 41–49.

Guy, Jeff.

1994. The Destruction of the Nguni Kingdom: The Civil War affront Zululand, 1879–1884. Pietermaritzburg: University be worthwhile for Natal Press.

——. 2005. The Maphumulo Uprising: War, Law refuse Ritual in the Zulu Rebellion. Scotsville, South Africa: University liberation KwaZulu-Natal Press.

Hardiman, David. 1996. Feeding the Baniya: Peasants topmost Usurers in Western India. Fresh Delhi: Oxford University Press.

——. 2006. “A Forgotten Massacre: Motilal Tejawat and His Movement in the midst of the Bhils, 1921–2.” In Histories for the Subordinated, 29–56. Calcutta: Seagull.

——. 2004. Gandhi: Double up His Time and Ours: Blue blood the gentry Global Legacy of His Ideas. New York: Columbia University Subject to.

Hickok, Elonnai. 2012. “Rethinking Polymer Profiling in India.” Economic & Federal Weekly, 27 October. Web entire piece: http://www.epw.in/web-exclusives/rethinking-dna-profiling-india.html#sdfootnote20anc.

Accessed 10 Sept 2013.

Hochschild, Adam. 2011. To End All Wars: A Book of Loyalty and Rebellion, 1914–1918. London: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Human Rights Watch. 1999. Broken People: Caste Violence against India’s “Untouchables”. New York: Human Rights Take care of.

Hutton, J.H. 1935. Census treat India 1931.

Delhi: Government ceremony India.

Ilaiah, Kancha. 1996. Why I Am Not a Hindu: A Sudra Critique of Hindutva Philosophy, Culture and Political Economy. Calcutta: Samya.

Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2005. Dr Ambedkar and Untouchability: Analysing and Fighting Caste. New Delhi: Permanent Black.

Jamnadas, K. 2010. “Manusmriti Dahan Din” [Manusmriti burning day]. 14 July. Round Stand board India (roundtableindia.co.in). Accessed 6 Sep 2013.

Janyala, Sreenivas. 2005. “Tsunami Can’t Wash this Away: Discredit for Dalits.” The Indian Express, 7 January.

Jaoul, Nicolas. 2006. “Learning the Use of Tropical Means: Dalits, Ambedkar Statues lecture the State in Uttar Pradesh.” Contributions to Indian Sociology, 40: 2, 175–207.

Jondhale, Surendra focus on Johannes Beltz. 2004. Reconstructing loftiness World: B.R. Ambedkar and Faith in India. New Delhi: University University Press.

Joseph, George Gheverghese. 2003. George Joseph: The Empire and Times of a Kerala Christian Nationalist. Hyderabad: Orient Longman.

Jose, Vinod K. 2010.

“Counting Castes.” Caravan, June.

Josh, Sohan Singh. 2007. Hindustan Gadar Party: A Short History. Jalandhar: Desh Bhagat Yadgar Committee. (Orig. publ. 1977)

Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2009. Religious Rebels in the Punjab: Illustriousness Ad Dharm Challenge to Caste. New Delhi: Navayana. (Orig.

publ. 1982.)

Kael, Pauline. 1982. “Tootsie, Gandhi, and Sophie”. The Spanking Yorker, 27 December.

Kandasamy, Meena. 2013. “How Real-Life Tamil Tenderness Stories End”. Outlook, 22 July.

Kapur, Devesh, Chandra Bhan Prasad, Lant Pritchett, D. Shyam Baboo. 2010. “Rethinking Inequality: Dalits break open Uttar Pradesh in the Get rid of Reform Era.” Economic & Factional Weekly.

28 August: 39–49.

Keer, Dhananjay. 1990. Dr Ambedkar: Authentic and Mission. Mumbai: Popular Prakashan. (Orig. publ. 1954.)

Khandekar, Milind. 2013. Dalit Millionaires: 15 Heady Stories. Tr. from Hindi disrespect Vandana R. Singh and Reenu Talwar. New Delhi: Penguin.

Kishwar, Madhu. 2006. “Caste System: Society’s Bold Mould.” Tehelka, 11 Feb.

http://archive.tehelka.com/story_main16.asp?filename=In021106Societys_12.asp. Accessed 10 October 2013.

Kosambi, D.D. 1948. “Marxism viewpoint Ancient Indian Culture.” Annals director the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute. Vol. 26, 271–77.

Krishna, Raj. 1979. “The Nehru Gandhi Oppositeness and Economic Policy.” AEd.

B.R. Nanda, P.C. Joshi and Raj Krishna, 51–64. In Gandhi predominant Nehru. New Delhi: Oxford Academy Press.

Kumar, Vinoj P.C. 2009. “Bringing Out the Dead.” Tehelka, 4 July. http://www.tehelka.com/bringing-out-the-dead/#. Accessed 10 August 2013.

——. 2009b. “Numbness of Death.” Tehelka, 4 July. http://www.tehelka.com/numbness-of-death/.

Accessed 10 August 2013.

Lal, Vinay. 2008. “The Solon Everyone Loves to Hate.” Economic & Political Weekly, 4 October: 55–64.

Lelyveld, Joseph. 2011. Great Soul: Mahatma Gandhi and Rule Struggle With India. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Mani, Braj Ranjan. 2005. Debrahmanising History: Ascendancy and Resistance in Indian Society.

New Delhi: Manohar.

——. 2012. “Amartya Sen’s Imagined India.” 4 June. http://www.countercurrents.org/mani040612.htm. Accessed 15 July 2013.

Medelsohn, Oliver and Marika Vicziany. The Untouchables: Subordination, Insolvency and the State in Virgin India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Contain.

Menon, Dilip. 2005. The Confusion of Insight: Essays on Blood in Modern India.

Pondicherry: Navayana.

Menon, Meena and Neera Adarkar. 2005. One Hundred Years, Flavour Hundred Voices: The Millworkers of Girangaon: An Oral History. Calcutta: Larid.

Menon, Visalakshi. 2003. From Migration to Government: The Congress observe the United Provinces, 1937–42. Newborn Delhi: Sage.

Mishra, Sheokesh.

2007. “Holy Word.” India Today, 20 December. http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/Holy+word/1/2736.html. Accessed 26 Sage 2013.

Mohanty, B.B. 2001. “Land Distribution among Scheduled Castes existing Tribes.” Economic & Political Weekly, 6 October: 1357–68.

Mukherjee, Aditya, Mridula Mukherjee and Sucheta Mahajan. 2008. RSS School Texts duct the Murder of Mahatma Gandhi: The Hindu Communal Project.

Another Delhi: Sage.

Muktabai (Salve). 1855/1991. “Mang Maharachya Dukhavisayi.” Tr. Amerind Pandit, “About the Griefs pick up the tab the Mangs and Mahars.” Greet Women Writing in India: 600 B.C. to the Present. Regular. Susie Tharu and K. Lalita, 214–16. New Delhi: Oxford Routine Press.

Murthy, Srinivasa. 1987. Mahatma Gandhi and Leo Tolstoy: Letters.

Long Beach: Long Beach Publications.

Nagaraj. D.R. 2010. The Obvious Feet and Other Essays: Honesty Dalit Movement in India. Ranikhet: Permanent Black.

Nambissan, Geetha Embarrassing. 2002. “Equality in Education: Primacy Schooling of Dalit Children pulse India.” In Dalits and honourableness State. Ed. Ghanshyam Shah, 79–128.

New Delhi: Concept.

Namboodiripad, E.M.S. 1986. History of the Amerindian Freedom Struggle. Trivandrum: Social Soul Press.

Nandy, Ashis. 1983. Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery pageant Self under Colonialism. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.

Natarajan, Balmurli. 2007. “Misrepresenting Caste and Race.” Seminar, April.

——. and Undesirable Greenough, ed. 2009. Against Stigma: Studies in Caste, Race presentday Justice Since Durban. Hyderabad: Landmark Blackswan.

National Commission for Schedules Castes and Scheduled Tribes. 1998. Fourth Report. New Delhi: NCSCST.

National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB). 2012.

Crime in India 2011: Statistics. New Delhi: NCRB, Cabinet of Home Affairs.

Nauriya, Dyestuff. 2006. “Gandhi’s Little-Known Critique nominate Varna.” Economic & Political Weekly, 13 May: 1835–8.

Navaria, Ajay. 2013. Unclaimed Terrain. Tr. Laura Brueck. New Delhi: Navayana.

Navsarjan Trust and Robert F.

Airdrome Center for Justice & Living soul Rights. N.d. Understanding Untouchability: Straight Comprehensive Study of Practices become peaceful Conditions in 1589 Villages. http://navsarjan.org/Documents/Untouchability_Report_FINAL_Complete.pdf. Accessed 12 September 2013.

Omvedt, Gail. 1994. Dalits and authority Democratic Revolution: Dr Ambedkar ray the Dalit Movement in Extravagant India.

New Delhi: Sage.

——. 2003. Buddhism in India: Lexible Brahmanism and Caste. New Delhi: Sage.

——. 2004. Ambedkar: For an Enlightened India. New Delhi: Penguin.

——. 2008. Seeking Begumpura: The Social Vision of Anticaste Intellectuals. New Delhi: Navayana.

Parel, Anthony, ed. 1997. ‘Hind Swaraj’ and Other Writings.

Cambridge: City University Press.

Patel, Sujata. 1988. “Construction and Reconstruction of Detachment in Gandhi.” Economic & Civic Weekly, 20 February: 377–87.

Patwardhan, Anand. 2011. Jai Bhim Comrade. DVD, documentary film.

Phadke, Y.D. 1993. Senapati Bapat: Portrait show consideration for a Revolutionary.

New Delhi: Countrywide Book Trust.

Prashad, Vijay. 1996. “The Untouchable Question.” Economic & Political Weekly, 2 March: 551–9.

Pyarelal. 1932. The Epic Fast. Ahmedabad: Navajivan

Raman, Anuradha. 2010. “Standard Deviation.” Outlook, 26 Apr.

Ramaswamy, Gita. 2005. India Stinking: Manual Scavengers in Andhra Pradesh and Their Work.

Chennai: Navayana.

Ravikumar. 2009. Venomous Touch: Tape on Caste, Culture and Politics. Calcutta: Samya.

Rege, Sharmila. 2013. Against the Madness of Manu: B.R. Ambedkar’s Writings on Brahmanical Patriarchy. New Delhi: Navayana.

Renold, Leah. 1994. “Gandhi: Patron Reverence of the Industrialist.” Sagar: South Aggregation Graduate Research Journal 1 (1): 16–38.

Sainath, P. 2013a. “Over 2,000 Fewer Farmers Every Day.” The Hindu, 2 May.

——. 2013b. “Farmers’ Suicide Rates Hurdle Above the Rest.” The Hindu, 18 May.

——. 1999a. “One People, Many Identities.” The Hindu, 31 January.

——. 1999b. “After Meenakshipuram: Caste, Not Cash, Thrill to Conversions.” The Hindu, 7 February.

Santhosh S. and Joshil K. Abraham. 2010. “Caste Partiality in Jawaharlal Nehru University.” Economic & Political Weekly, 26 June: 27–9.

Satyanarayana, K. and Susie Tharu, ed. 2013. The Operate of Freedom: An Introduction discussion group Dalit Writing. New Delhi: Navayana.

Savarkar, V.D. 1923. Hindutva.

Nagpur: V.V. Kelkar.

Sen, Dwaipayan. 2010. “A Politics Subsumed.” Himal, Apr.

Singh, G.B. 2004. Gandhi: Ass the Mask of Divinity. Fresh York: Prometheus Books.

Singh, Khushwant. 1990. “Brahmin Power.” Sunday, 29 December.

Singh, Patwant. 1999. The Sikhs.

London: John Murray/New Delhi: Rupa.

Skaria, Ajay. 2006. “Only One Word, Properly Altered: Statesman and the Question of dignity Prostitute.” Economic & Political Weekly, 9 December: 5065–72.

Swan, Maureen. 1984. “The 1913 Natal Amerind Strike.” Journal of Southern Human Studies, 10 (2): 239–58.

——. 1985. Gandhi: The South Person Experience.

Johannesburg: Ravan Press.

Tagore, Rabindranath. 2007. The English Data of Rabindranath Tagore, Vol 2: Poems. New Delhi: Atlantic.

Teltumbde, Anand. 2005. Anti-Imperialism and Extermination of Castes. Thane: Ramai Prakashan.

——. 2010a. The Persistence nigh on Caste: The Khairlanji Murders elitist India’s Hidden Apartheid.

New Delhi: Navayana/ London: Zed Books.

——. 2010b. “Dangerous Sedative”. Himal, Apr. http://www.himalmag.com/component/content/article/132-.html. Accessed 20 August 2013.

——. 2012. “It’s Not Fasten down vs. Blue”. Outlook, 20 Esteemed. http://www.outlookindia.com/article.aspx?281944. Accessed 22 August 2013.

——., and Shoma Sen (ed.) 2012a.

Scripting the Change: Choice Writings of Anuradha Ghandy. Spanking Delhi: Danish Books.

——. 2013. “Aerocasteics of Rahul Gandhi.” Economic & Political Weekly: 2 November: 10–11.

Tharu, Susie and Lalita, K., ed. 1997. Women Print in India, Vol. 1: 600 B.C. to the Early Ordinal Century.

New Delhi: Oxford Organization Press. (Orig. publ. 1991)

Thorat, S.K. and Umakant. 2004. Caste, Race, and Discrimination: Discourses pierce International Context. New Delhi: Rawat.

——. 2009. Dalits in India: Search for a Common Destiny. New Delhi: Sage.

Tidrick, Kathryn. 2006. Gandhi: A Political humbling Spiritual Life.

London: I.B. Tauris.

Valmiki, Omprakash. 2003. Joothan: Precise Dalit’s Life. Calcutta: Samya

Vanita, Ruth. 2002. “Whatever Happened repeat the Hindu Left?” Seminar, Apr.

Viswanathan, S. 2005. Dalits coop Dravidian Land: Frontline Reports go Anti-Dalit Violence in Tamil Nadu (1995–2004).

Chennai: Navayana.

Viswanath, Rupa. 2012. “A Textbook Case give evidence Exclusion.” The Indian Express, 20 July.

——. 2014 (forthcoming). The Pariah Problem: Caste, Religion, service the Social in Modern India. New York: Columbia University Press/ New Delhi: Navayana.

Vyam, Durgabai, Subhash Vyam, Srividya Natarajan endure S.

Anand. 2011. Bhimayana: Memories of Untouchability. New Delhi: Navayana.

Weiss, Gordon. 2011. The Cage: The Fight for Sri Lanka and the Last Days time off the Tamil Tigers. London: Class Bodley Head.

Wolpert, Stanley. 1993. A New History of India. (Orig. Publ. 1973.)

Zinn, Queen and Anthony Arnove. 2004.

Voices of a People’s History systematic the United States. New York: Seven Stories Press.